These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39218688)
1. Surface roughness associated with bacterial adhesion on dental resin-based materials. Bunz O; Diekamp M; Bizhang M; Testrich H; Piwowarczyk A Dent Mater J; 2024 Sep; 43(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 39218688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. Keul C; Liebermann A; Schmidlin PR; Roos M; Sener B; Stawarczyk B J Adhes Dent; 2014 Aug; 16(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 25133270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface roughness of different types of resin composites after artificial aging procedures: an in vitro study. Biçer Z; Yaman BC; Çeliksöz Ö; Tepe H BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):876. PubMed ID: 39095862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips. Kitaygorodskiy A; Gregory RL; Lim G; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Oct; 50(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 39023858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of sandblasting and bonding on the shear bond strength between differently pigmented polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and veneering composite after artificial aging. Adali U; Sütel M; Yassine J; Mao Z; Müller WD; Schwitalla AD Dent Mater; 2024 Aug; 40(8):1123-1127. PubMed ID: 38824001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface. Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discoloration of PMMA, composite, and PEEK. Heimer S; Schmidlin PR; Stawarczyk B Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1191-1200. PubMed ID: 27344329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. Buergers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Bötel F; Zimmermann T; Sütel M; Müller WD; Schwitalla AD Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):e246-e254. PubMed ID: 29935768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of combining different surface treatments on the surface characteristics of polyetheretherketone-based core materials and shear bond strength to a veneering composite resin. Taha D; Safwat F; Wahsh M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):599.e1-599.e7. PubMed ID: 35135675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. Stawarczyk B; Jordan P; Schmidlin PR; Roos M; Eichberger M; Gernet W; Keul C J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1278-88. PubMed ID: 24969411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biofilm formation on polyetheretherketone and titanium surfaces. Barkarmo S; Longhorn D; Leer K; Johansson CB; Stenport V; Franco-Tabares S; Kuehne SA; Sammons R Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Aug; 5(4):427-437. PubMed ID: 31452954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study on the surface properties of different commercially available CAD/CAM materials for implant-supported restorations. Vulović S; Todorović A; Stančić I; Popovac A; Stašić JN; Vencl A; Milić-Lemić A J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Oct; 34(7):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 35997320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical reinforcement by CAD-CAM materials affects stress distributions of posterior composite bridges: 3D finite element analysis. Elraggal A; Abdelraheem IM; Watts DC; Roy S; Dommeti VK; Alshabib A; Althaqafi KA; Afifi RR Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):869-877. PubMed ID: 38609774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of toothbrush hardness on in vitro wear and roughness of composite resins. Kyoizumi H; Yamada J; Suzuki T; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Sasaki K J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1137-44. PubMed ID: 24858764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal evaluation of simulated toothbrushing on the roughness and optical stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanofilled resin-based composites. da Silva EM; Dória J; da Silva Jde J; Santos GV; Guimarães JG; Poskus LT J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1081-90. PubMed ID: 23994711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. Liebermann A; Wimmer T; Schmidlin PR; Scherer H; Löffler P; Roos M; Stawarczyk B J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):321-8.e2. PubMed ID: 26548869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does dental material type influence bacterial adhesion under the same polishing conditions? Direct observation using a fluorescent staining technique: An in vitro study. Tonprasong W; Inokoshi M; Tamura M; Yoshihara K; Takahashi R; Nozaki K; Wada T; Minakuchi S Dent Mater J; 2024 Jul; 43(4):485-494. PubMed ID: 38825451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]