These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39221958)

  • 1. Quality and Readability Analysis of Turbinoplasty on the Web.
    Davis WT; DeShazo S; Rossi N; Pine H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39221958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction.
    Pattenden TA; Raleigh RA; Pattenden ER; Thangasamy IA
    BJUI Compass; 2021 Nov; 2(6):412-418. PubMed ID: 35474701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented Web-based information regarding tooth avulsion.
    Nangia D; Saini A; Krishnan A; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Logani A
    Dent Traumatol; 2022 Aug; 38(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 35225429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.
    Steiner SM; Slavych BK; Zraick RI
    Dysphagia; 2023 Jun; 38(3):990-1000. PubMed ID: 36205800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
    Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
    Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the Quality and Readability of Online Resources for Plantar Fasciitis.
    Lim ST; Kelly M; O'Neill S; D'Souza L
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2021; 60(6):1175-1178. PubMed ID: 34092460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
    Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pelvic vein embolization: an assessment of the readability and quality of online information for patients.
    Lee RJ; O'Neill DC; Brassil M; Alderson J; Lee MJ
    CVIR Endovasc; 2020 Oct; 3(1):52. PubMed ID: 32886198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximal Humerus Fracture: An Evaluation of the Readability and Value of Web-Based Knowledge.
    Elshohna M; Hidayat Y; Karkuri A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27957. PubMed ID: 36120225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the quality and readability of online information on autopsy for the general public: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Hanley B; Brown P; O'Neill S; Osborn M
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e023804. PubMed ID: 31152026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-Directed Vasectomy Information: How Readable Is It?
    Kianian R; Hu MY; Lavold AJ; Andino JJ; Morrison JC; Eleswarapu SV; Mills JN
    World J Mens Health; 2024 Apr; 42(2):408-414. PubMed ID: 37853530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
    Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
    Aboalshamat K
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower Back Pain Imaging: A Readability Analysis.
    Valentine MJ; Cottone G; Kramer HD; Kayastha A; Kim J; Pettinelli NJ; Kramer RC
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45174. PubMed ID: 37842495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
    Vågenes H; Pranić SM
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Varicocele Embolization: An Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information.
    Alderson JH; O'Neil DC; Redmond CE; Mulholland D; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):841-846. PubMed ID: 31494004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.