These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39225004)

  • 1. Delayed covering causes the accumulation of motile sperm, leading to overestimation of sperm concentration and motility with a Makler counting chamber.
    Yu L; Cheng QY; Jia YL; Zheng Y; Yang TT; Wu YB; Li FP
    Asian J Androl; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39225004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delay in the application of the cover glass is a potential source of error with the Makler Counting Chamber.
    Matson P; Irving J; Zuvela E; Hughes R
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Sep; 72(3):559-61. PubMed ID: 10519637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agreement and internal quality assurance of the Neubauer hemocytometer and Makler chamber for human sperm concentration determination.
    Costa AF; Onofre FBM; Onofre ASC
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2024 Jun; 28(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 38530757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Peng N; Zou X; Li L
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrepancies in sperm count using improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers.
    Imade GE; Towobola OA; Sagay AS; Otubu JA
    Arch Androl; 1993; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8373281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy Evaluation of The Depth of Six Kinds of Sperm Counting Chambers for both Manual and Computer-Aided Semen Analyses.
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Int J Fertil Steril; 2016; 9(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 26985341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of chamber characteristics on the reliability of sperm concentration and movement measurements obtained by manual and videomicrographic analysis.
    Ginsburg KA; Armant DR
    Fertil Steril; 1990 May; 53(5):882-7. PubMed ID: 2332061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of different filling method-related sperm counting chambers and structural factors of disposable chambers on sperm motility].
    Zheng LJ; Zhang JW; Peng YY; Wang HL; Zhou XM; Wang W
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Nov; 27(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 37422871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance for sperm concentration using latex beads.
    Peters AJ; Zaneveld LJ; Jeyendran RS
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Oct; 60(4):702-5. PubMed ID: 8405529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The performance of 10 different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration.
    Mahmoud AM; Depoorter B; Piens N; Comhaire FH
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Aug; 68(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 9240267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparing the sperm concentration determined by the Makler and the Neubauer chambers].
    Cardona-Maya W; Berdugo J; Cadavid A
    Actas Urol Esp; 2008 Apr; 32(4):443-5. PubMed ID: 18540267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality evaluation of three different sperm counting chambers].
    Lu J; Lü N; Huang Y; Li PS; Fisch H
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Oct; 10(10):755-7, 760. PubMed ID: 15562789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
    Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers.
    Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hansen C
    Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 15710187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of the depth of the sperm counting chamber on sperm motility].
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Sep; 19(9):776-9. PubMed ID: 24386852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of four chambers to measure sperm concentration: results from an external quality assurance programme.
    Zuvela E; Matson P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Oct; 41(4):671-678. PubMed ID: 32843307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.