These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39229369)

  • 1. Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Li F; Liu S; Gu Y; Li S; Tao Y; Wei Y; Chen Y
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2024; 18():1803-1813. PubMed ID: 39229369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
    Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
    Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
    Webb EJD; Meads D; Lynch Y; Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Meredith S; Moulam L; Hess S; Murray J
    Value Health; 2021 Apr; 24(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 33840436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.
    van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.
    Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Zweifel P; Johnson FR
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):2. PubMed ID: 26743636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
    Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Krucien N; Watson V; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e1-e16. PubMed ID: 27917560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worst scaling?
    Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Oppe M; Krabbe PF
    Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Apr; 15(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 23553075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrete choice experiments or best-worst scaling? A qualitative study to determine the suitability of preference elicitation tasks in research with children and young people.
    Rogers HJ; Marshman Z; Rodd H; Rowen D
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 5(1):26. PubMed ID: 33689059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
    Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
    Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a Patient-Centered Preference Tool for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
    Cole A; Richardson DR; Adapa K; Khasawneh A; Crossnohere N; Bridges JFP; Mazur L
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2022 Jun; 11(6):e39586. PubMed ID: 35767340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.
    Ratcliffe J; Couzner L; Flynn T; Sawyer M; Stevens K; Brazier J; Burgess L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 21033766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Crossnohere NL; Janse S; Janssen E; Bridges JFP
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 32885395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
    Netten A; Burge P; Malley J; Potoglou D; Towers AM; Brazier J; Flynn T; Forder J; Wall B
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(16):1-166. PubMed ID: 22459668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.
    Malhotra R; Suppiah SD; Tan YW; Sung P; Tay SSC; Tan NC; Koh GC; Chan A; Chew LST; Ozdemir S;
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2023 Nov; 19(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 37507340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.
    Severin F; Schmidtke J; Mühlbacher A; Rogowski WH
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Nov; 21(11):1202-8. PubMed ID: 23486538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using best-worst scaling choice experiments to measure public perceptions and preferences for healthcare reform in australia.
    Louviere JJ; Flynn TN
    Patient; 2010 Dec; 3(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 22273434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.