These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39232737)
1. A gender and size specific evaluation of Grammont-type inlay versus lateralizing onlay stem designs in achieving lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Imiolczyk JP; Zeid PA; Eckl L; Imiolczyk T; Gohlke F BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Sep; 25(1):709. PubMed ID: 39232737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of humeral stem and glenosphere designs on range of motion and muscle length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Collin P; Zbinden O; Chiu JC; Boileau P; Olivier F; Walch G Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):519-530. PubMed ID: 31900574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study. Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility. Freislederer F; Moroder P; Audigé L; Schneller T; Ameziane Y; Trefzer R; Imiolczyk JP; Scheibel M BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Mar; 25(1):204. PubMed ID: 38454432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study. Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty design-inlay vs. onlay: does it really make a difference? Colasanti CA; Mercer NP; Contreras E; Simovitch RW; Zuckerman JD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Sep; 33(9):2073-2085. PubMed ID: 38582254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Gauci MO; Glevarec L; Bronsard N; Cointat C; Pelletier Y; Boileau P; Gonzalez JF J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Aug; 33(8):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 38281677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model. Huish EG; Athwal GS; Neyton L; Walch G Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 33044311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lateralized glenosphere reverse shoulder arthroplasty: inlay and onlay designs have similar clinical outcomes in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Meshram P; Joseph J; Zhou Y; Srikumaran U; McFarland EG J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Apr; 31(4):747-754. PubMed ID: 34543744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome? Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component. Pak T; Ardebol J; Menendez ME; Gobezie R; Sears BW; Lederman E; ; Werner BC; Denard PJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; 33(6S):S1-S8. PubMed ID: 38237722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference? Freislederer F; Toft F; Audigé L; Marzel A; Endell D; Scheibel M J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):341-351. PubMed ID: 34450279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posteroinferior glenosphere positioning is associated with improved range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and lateralized glenoid. Pak T; Ardebol J; Kilic AI; Sears BW; Lederman E; ; Werner BC; Moroder P; Denard PJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Oct; 33(10):2171-2177. PubMed ID: 38537768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of constrained humeral liner on impingement-free range of motion and impingement type in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a computer simulation. Nakazawa K; Manaka T; Minoda Y; Hirakawa Y; Ito Y; Iio R; Nakamura H J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):181-191. PubMed ID: 37598837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Walch G Int Orthop; 2018 Jun; 42(6):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 29492611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for patients with cuff tear arthropathy: do clinical outcomes differ by inlay vs. onlay design? Meshram P; Łukasiewicz P; Okeke L; Srikumaran U; McFarland EG J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Dec; 33(12):2604-2611. PubMed ID: 38754541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]