These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is larger better for external rotation and abduction strength? Müller AM; Born M; Jung C; Flury M; Kolling C; Schwyzer HK; Audigé L J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 28747277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can we separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Schippers P; Lacouture JD; Junker M; Baranowski A; Drees P; Gercek E; Boileau P J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; 33(5):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 37890767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G Bone Joint J; 2018 Sep; 100-B(9):1182-1186. PubMed ID: 30168761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. Merolla G; Walch G; Ascione F; Paladini P; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Porcellini G J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Apr; 27(4):701-710. PubMed ID: 29290604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1726-1731. PubMed ID: 28528016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results according to Glenosphere Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Short-term Follow-up Study. Choi CH; Kim SG; Lee JJ; Kwack BH Clin Orthop Surg; 2017 Mar; 9(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 28261432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Clinical Performance of Inlay versus Onlay Humerus Implants in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Lee HJ; Yoon CY; Kim YS Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 36778983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mid-term comparative study between the glenoid and humerus lateralization designs for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which lateralization design is better? Lee HH; Park SE; Ji JH; Jun HS BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):290. PubMed ID: 37059977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inlay versus onlay humeral design for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Larose G; Fisher ND; Gambhir N; Alben MG; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS; Kwon YW J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2410-2420. PubMed ID: 35671928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Carrazana-Suarez LF; Panico LC; Smolinski MP; Blake RJ; McCroskey MA; Sykes JB; Lin A J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S158-S165. PubMed ID: 35378314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Liu B; Kim YK; Nakla A; Chung MS; Kwak D; McGarry MH; Lee TQ; Oh JH J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1662-1672. PubMed ID: 37044302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has an impact on acromial stresses. Wong MT; Langohr GDG; Athwal GS; Johnson JA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Nov; 25(11):1889-1895. PubMed ID: 27374235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic and anatomic variations on postoperative acromion fractures after inlay and lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Polisetty T; Cannon D; Grewal G; Vakharia R; Levy JC J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 35940534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The risk of postoperative scapular spine fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increased with an onlay humeral stem. Haidamous G; Lädermann A; Frankle MA; Gorman RA; Denard PJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2556-2563. PubMed ID: 32713666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Berhouet J; Garaud P; Favard L J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Feb; 23(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23850310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How anatomic should anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty be? Evaluation of humeral head reconstruction with the best-fit circle. Hoffman RA; Covarrubias O; Agaisse T; Portnoff B; Green A J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; 33(6S):S43-S48. PubMed ID: 38554996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Posteroinferior relevant scapular neck offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: key player for motion and friction-type impingement in a computer model. Bauer S; Blakeney WG; Goyal N; Flayac H; Wang A; Corbaz J J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2638-2646. PubMed ID: 35931331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]