403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3923354)
1. Interhospital differences in severity of illness. Problems for prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
Horn SD; Bulkley G; Sharkey PD; Chambers AF; Horn RA; Schramm CJ
N Engl J Med; 1985 Jul; 313(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 3923354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of the relationship between severity of illness and hospital cost in New Jersey hospitals.
Averill RF; McGuire TE; Manning BE; Fowler DA; Horn SD; Dickson PS; Coye MJ; Knowlton DL; Bender JA
Health Serv Res; 1992 Dec; 27(5):587-606; discussion 607-12. PubMed ID: 1464535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological limitations in case mix hospital reimbursement, with a proposal for change.
Williams SV; Kominski GF; Dowd BE; Soper KA
Inquiry; 1984; 21(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 6232213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Change in MS-DRG assignment and hospital reimbursement as a result of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid changes in payment for hospital-acquired conditions: is it coding or quality?
McNutt R; Johnson TJ; Odwazny R; Remmich Z; Skarupski K; Meurer S; Hohmann S; Harting B
Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 20042930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the feasibility and usefulness of physician DRGs.
Culler S; Ehrenfried D
Inquiry; 1986; 23(1):40-55. PubMed ID: 2937728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.
Muldoon JH
Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Economic survival for the 80's--are we an endangered species?" DRGs effect on hospitals and physicians.
Silverman JF
Alaska Med; 1984; 26(2):40-9. PubMed ID: 6431842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician DRGs.
Mitchell JB
N Engl J Med; 1985 Sep; 313(11):670-5. PubMed ID: 3927164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do older Medicare patients cost hospitals more? Evidence from an academic medical center.
Rosenthal GE; Landefeld CS
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Jan; 153(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 8422203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The University of Alabama Hospitals prepares for Medicare DRG reimbursement.
Moon JE
Ala J Med Sci; 1984 Jan; 21(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 6422783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DRGs and hospital case records: implications for Medicare case mix accuracy.
Johnson AN; Appel GL
Inquiry; 1984; 21(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 6237993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. All-payer severity-adjusted diagnosis-related groups: a uniform method to severity-adjust discharge data.
Leary RS; Johantgen ME; Farley D; Forthman MT; Wooster LD
Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):60-71. PubMed ID: 10165388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DRG-based prospective payment: what does the future hold?
May JJ
J Med Pract Manage; 1986; 2(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10312031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trauma care reimbursement: comparison of DRGs to an injury severity-based payment system.
Eastham JN; Steinwachs DM; MacKenzie EJ
J Trauma; 1991 Feb; 31(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 1899709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The distributional implications of using relative prices in DRG payment systems.
Thorpe KE
Inquiry; 1987; 24(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 2951338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring severity of illness to predict patient resource use within DRGs.
Horn SD; Sharkey PD
Inquiry; 1983; 20(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 6229481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
Averill RF; Kalison MJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):72-4, 78-84. PubMed ID: 10315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ICD-9-CM DRGs: increased homogeneity through use of AS-SCORE.
Panniers TL; Tomkiewicz ZM
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Feb; 11(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 3920601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
