These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39235271)

  • 1. Relating monaural and binaural measures of modulation sensitivity in listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Best V; Conroy C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Sep; 156(3):1543-1551. PubMed ID: 39235271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
    Eddins AC; Eddins DA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences: Modeling Auditory Modulation Filtering.
    Brughera A; Ballestero JA; McAlpine D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):35-57. PubMed ID: 34741225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of age and hearing loss on interaural phase difference discrimination.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):342-51. PubMed ID: 24437774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3884-96. PubMed ID: 21682411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Wang S; Xu L; Mannell R
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 12(6):783-94. PubMed ID: 21833816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age on sensitivity to interaural time differences in envelope and fine structure, individually and in combination.
    Moore BCJ; Heinz MG; Braida LD; Léger AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1287. PubMed ID: 29604696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences.
    Lacher-Fougère S; Demany L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2519-26. PubMed ID: 16266172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.