These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39236121)

  • 1. Blind Video Quality Prediction by Uncovering Human Video Perceptual Representation.
    Liao L; Xu K; Wu H; Chen C; Sun W; Yan Q; Jay Kuo CC; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():4998-5013. PubMed ID: 39236121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Completely Blind Quality Assessment of User Generated Video Content.
    Kancharla P; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():263-274. PubMed ID: 34855597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos.
    Seshadrinathan K; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Feb; 19(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 19846374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Rendered Human Avatar Videos in Virtual Reality.
    Chen YC; Saha A; Chapiro A; Hane C; Bazin JC; Qiu B; Zanetti S; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():5740-5754. PubMed ID: 39356598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A convolutional neural network approach for objective video quality assessment.
    Le Callet P; Viard-Gaudin C; Barba D
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2006 Sep; 17(5):1316-27. PubMed ID: 17001990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video.
    Seshadrinathan K; Soundararajan R; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1427-41. PubMed ID: 20129861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Video processing for human perceptual visual quality-oriented video coding.
    Oh H; Kim W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Apr; 22(4):1526-35. PubMed ID: 23247854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assessment for wireless capsule endoscopy videos compressed via HEVC: From diagnostic quality to visual perception.
    Usman MA; Usman MR; Shin SY
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Dec; 91():112-134. PubMed ID: 29059590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment Model Using Hybrid Spatiotemporal Features.
    Zeng H; Huang H; Hou J; Cao J; Wang Y; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():6175-6187. PubMed ID: 36126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Video quality assessment using motion-compensated temporal filtering and manifold feature similarity.
    Song Y; Yu M; Jiang G; Shao F; Peng Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175798. PubMed ID: 28445489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RAVA: Region-Based Average Video Quality Assessment.
    Wu X; Cheng I; Zhou Z; Basu A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of Spatio-Temporal Modeling in Video Quality Assessment.
    Fang Y; Li Z; Yan J; Sui X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():2693-2702. PubMed ID: 37145945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual quality metric with internal generative mechanism.
    Wu J; Lin W; Shi G; Liu A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jan; 22(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 22910116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind Video Quality Assessment for Ultra-High-Definition Video Based on Super-Resolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Ying Z; Pan D; Shi P
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content.
    Tu Z; Wang Y; Birkbeck N; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():4449-4464. PubMed ID: 33856995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FOVQA: Blind Foveated Video Quality Assessment.
    Jin Y; Patney A; Webb R; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4571-4584. PubMed ID: 35767478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.