117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3923896)
1. Improved performance of plasma gonadotrophin assays using common reagents and assay protocols: evidence from the UK External Quality Assessment Scheme.
Hayes M; Ferguson KM; Jeffcoate SL; Bacon RR; Seth J
Ann Clin Biochem; 1985 Mar; 22 ( Pt 2)():179-84. PubMed ID: 3923896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assays for follicle stimulating hormone and luteinising hormone: guidelines for the provision of a clinical biochemistry service.
Beastall GH; Ferguson KM; O'Reilly DS; Seth J; Sheridan B
Ann Clin Biochem; 1987 May; 24 ( Pt 3)():246-62. PubMed ID: 3111341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial contamination of QC specimens as a cause of artefactually poor performance in the UK EQAS.
Kemp LR; Ferguson KM; Jeffcoate SL
Ann Clin Biochem; 1987 Mar; 24 ( Pt 2)():182-4. PubMed ID: 3109307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A standardised multicentre procedure for plasma gonadotrophin radioimmunoassay.
Ferguson KM; Hayes M; Jeffcoate SL
Ann Clin Biochem; 1982 Sep; 19(Pt 5):358-61. PubMed ID: 6814336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Progress and problems in immunoassays for serum pituitary gonadotrophins: evidence from the UK external quality assessment schemes, (EQAS) 1980-1988.
Seth J; Hanning I; Bacon RR; Hunter WM
Clin Chim Acta; 1989 Dec; 186(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 2515012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved performance of ELISAs for fertility assessment using common reagents and assay protocol as evidence from quality control studies.
Desai MP; Donde UM; Khatkhatay MI
J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2002; 23(2):163-80. PubMed ID: 12033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of performance of assays for serum growth hormone in the United Kingdom (UK): evidence from the UK external quality assessment scheme, 1980-1987.
Seth J; Hanning I; Bacon RR; Hunter WM
Clin Chim Acta; 1988 May; 174(2):171-83. PubMed ID: 3383442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Data analysis and quality control in radioimmunoanalysis. II. Evaluation of the internal and external quality in the quantification of pituitary gonadotropins].
Menjívar M; Cárdenas M; Ulloa-Aguirre A; Recio R; Rocha C; Bedolla N; Pérez-Palacios G; Garza-Flores J
Rev Invest Clin; 1990; 42(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 2128659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Rapid immunoassay of LH, FSH by addition of precipitating stabilizer: basic and clinical studies].
Yamoto M; Yagi S; Nakano Y; Nishihata O; Torizumi K
Horumon To Rinsho; 1980 Jul; 28(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 6780250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [A study on LH- and FSH-RIA kits by immunoradiometric assay].
Kobayashi M; Sakai R; Satoh S; Kanai M
Radioisotopes; 1990 Feb; 39(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 2109341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radioimmunoassay for FSH and LH using CIS radioimmunoassay kits (author's transl)].
Seki K; Nakajima H; Ikari M; Ogawa T; Makimura N
Horumon To Rinsho; 1980; 28(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 6772361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainty of measurement for 14 immunoassay analytes: application to laboratory result interpretation.
Çubukçu HC; Yavuz Ö; Devrim E
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019; 79(1-2):117-122. PubMed ID: 30626224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of 13 different immunometric assay kits for gonadotropins: implications for clinical investigation.
Taylor AE; Khoury RH; Crowley WF
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1994 Jul; 79(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 8027235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of 2 different radioimmunoassays in the evaluation of plasma LH and FSH: I. Methods of double antibody (NIH) II. Serono's commercial kits].
Fernández-Durango R; Puente Cuevas M; Bordiú Obanza E; Pérez-Infante V; López Macia A; Charro Salgado AL
Rev Clin Esp; 1978 Jul; 150(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 581308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an immunoenzymometric assay (IEMA) using automated system for determination of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone.
Fonseca E; Mason M; Galván RE; Pascoe D; Ochoa R; Hernández M; Zárate A
Arch Med Res; 1997; 28(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 9078591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multicenter evaluation of immunoassays for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and testosterone: concordance, imprecision and reference values.
Radicioni A; Lenzi A; Spaziani M; Anzuini A; Ruga G; Papi G; Raimondo M; Foresta C
J Endocrinol Invest; 2013 Oct; 36(9):739-44. PubMed ID: 24196213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Undetectable luteinizing hormone levels using a monoclonal immunometric assay.
Barbé F; Legagneur H; Watrin V; Klein M; Badonnel Y
J Endocrinol Invest; 1995 Nov; 18(10):806-8. PubMed ID: 8787959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The measurement of LH, FSH, and prolactin.
Wheeler MJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1065():105-16. PubMed ID: 23996359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpretations of five monoclonal immunoassays of lutropin and follitropin: effects of normalization with WHO standard.
Vermes I; Bonte HA; v d Sluijs Veer G; Schoemaker J
Clin Chem; 1991 Mar; 37(3):415-21. PubMed ID: 1900742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Fundamental and clinical studies on LH and FSH RIA kits (author's transl)].
Jibiki K; Yamanaka Y; Odagiri E; Demura R; Demura H
Horumon To Rinsho; 1981 Sep; 29(9):1159-66. PubMed ID: 6799235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
