These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39240585)

  • 1. Effects of spatial location on distractor interference.
    Kerzel D; Constant M
    J Vis; 2024 Sep; 24(9):4. PubMed ID: 39240585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic distractor environments reveal classic visual field anisotropies for judgments of temporal order.
    Cass J; Van der Burg E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):738-751. PubMed ID: 30520009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of the crowding effect in spatially adjacent but cortically remote visual stimuli.
    Liu T; Jiang Y; Sun X; He S
    Curr Biol; 2009 Jan; 19(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 19135367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stronger interference from distractors in the right hemifield during visual search.
    Carlei C; Kerzel D
    Laterality; 2018 Mar; 23(2):152-165. PubMed ID: 28502226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biased Competition between Targets and Distractors Reduces Attentional Suppression: Evidence from the Positivity Posterior Contralateral and Distractor Positivity.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1563-1575. PubMed ID: 35640105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield.
    Becker MW; Ravizza SM; Peltier C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2640-52. PubMed ID: 26220268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural mechanisms of surround attenuation and distractor competition in visual search.
    Boehler CN; Tsotsos JK; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(14):5213-24. PubMed ID: 21471356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.
    Huber-Huber C; Grubert A; Ansorge U; Eimer M
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2210-9. PubMed ID: 25589587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus.
    Wang L; Duan Y; Theeuwes J; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25280985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting.
    Scolari M; Awh E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385. PubMed ID: 30684205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink.
    Bae E; Jung S; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.
    Walker R; Deubel H; Schneider WX; Findlay JM
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Aug; 78(2):1108-19. PubMed ID: 9307138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemifield effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex.
    Kraft A; Kehrer S; Hagendorf H; Brandt SA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 33(12):2349-58. PubMed ID: 21545658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.