These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39243803)

  • 21. Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.
    González Rueda JR; García Ávila I; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
    J Clin Med; 2022 Mar; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 35268527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study.
    Zhang S; Cai Q; Chen W; Lin Y; Gao Y; Wu D; Chen J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):220-229. PubMed ID: 38033198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement using Robotics. A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies.
    Ravipati V; Mathews J; Altuhafy M; Nagi R; Khan J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Sep; 32(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 38691616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A retrospective study of dynamic navigation system-assisted implant placement.
    Ma L; Ye M; Wu M; Chen X; Shen S
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):759. PubMed ID: 37838655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study.
    Wang XY; Liu L; Guan MS; Liu Q; Zhao T; Li HB
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104240. PubMed ID: 35872224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study.
    Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of implant shape and length on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant surgery: An in vitro study.
    Wang Y; Yu S; Wang Y; Feng Y; Yan Q; Zhang Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Mar; 35(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38174662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery.
    Tao B; Shen Y; Sun Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):747-755. PubMed ID: 33112508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study.
    Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study.
    Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Autonomous robotic surgery for zygomatic implant placement and immediately loaded implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a preliminary research.
    Li C; Wang M; Deng H; Li S; Fang X; Liang Y; Ma X; Zhang Y; Li Y
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 May; 9(1):12. PubMed ID: 37204483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery.
    He J; Zhang Q; Wang X; Fu M; Zhang H; Song L; Pu R; Jiang Z; Yang G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):385-401. PubMed ID: 38214435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Novel Method to Achieve Preferable Bone-to-Implant Contact Area of Zygomatic Implants in Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophied Maxilla.
    Guo H; Jiang X; Di P; Lin Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 37099574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of radiographic marker registration versus a markerless trace registration method on the implant placement accuracy achieved by dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An in-vitro study.
    Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105072. PubMed ID: 38763387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study.
    Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study.
    Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L
    Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy and safety of a haptic operated and machine vision controlled collaborative robot for dental implant placement: A translational study.
    Qiao SC; Wu XY; Shi JY; Tonetti MS; Lai HC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Aug; 34(8):839-849. PubMed ID: 37309242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study.
    Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task-Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study.
    Chen J; Tao B; Yu X; Wu Y; Wang F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39442545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.