These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39243803)
41. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement: A case series. Yang S; Chen J; Li A; Deng K; Li P; Xu S J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104451. PubMed ID: 36781099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Accuracy of flapless surgery using an autonomous robotic system in full-arch immediate implant restoration: A case series. Shu Q; Chen D; Wang X; Liu Q; Ge Y; Su Y J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105017. PubMed ID: 38657725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series. Zhao N; Du L; Lv C; Liang J; He L; Zhou Q J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105035. PubMed ID: 38734299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of Kennedy class and number of implants on the accuracy of dynamic implant navigation: An in vitro study using an X-ray free evaluation methodology. Rutkunas V; Gendviliene I; Auskalnis L; Mangano F; Zlatev S; Ivanova V; Mijiritsky E; Borusevicius R J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104679. PubMed ID: 37683800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Accuracy of 3 calibration methods of computer-assisted dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study. Pei X; Liu X; Iao S; Ma F; Li H; Sun F J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):668-674. PubMed ID: 35431027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The accuracy of a novel image-guided hybrid robotic system for dental implant placement: An in vitro study. Tao B; Feng Y; Fan X; Lan K; Zhuang M; Wang S; Wang F; Chen X; Wu Y Int J Med Robot; 2023 Feb; 19(1):e2452. PubMed ID: 35946497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Implant placement using mixed reality-based dynamic navigation: A proof of concept. Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Mangano F J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105256. PubMed ID: 39043329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computer-Guided Approach for Placement of Zygomatic Implants: Novel Protocol and Surgical Guide. Rinaldi M; Ganz SD Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 30829495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series. Neugarten JM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 37939239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Zygomatic implant placement using a robot-assisted flapless protocol: proof of concept. Olivetto M; Bettoni J; Testelin S; Lefranc M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jun; 52(6):710-715. PubMed ID: 36517307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement. Zhan Y; Wang M; Cheng X; Li Y; Shi X; Liu F J Dent Educ; 2021 Feb; 85(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32914421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accuracy of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants in the severe atrophic maxilla: A pilot clinical study. Hung KF; Wang F; Wang HW; Zhou WJ; Huang W; Wu YQ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):458-465. PubMed ID: 28219120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study. Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandibular region was assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: a retrospective study. Geng N; Ren J; Zhang C; Zhou T; Feng C; Chen S BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):208. PubMed ID: 38336661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Does dynamic navigation assisted student training improve the accuracy of dental implant placement by postgraduate dental students: an in vitro study. Yan Q; Wu X; Shi J; Shi B BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):600. PubMed ID: 38778313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator. Marques-Guasch J; Rodriguez-Bauzá R; Satorres-Nieto M; Hom-Lay W; Hernández-Alfaro F; Gargallo-Albiol J Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Nov; 25(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 35060374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years. Yu X; Tao B; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104567. PubMed ID: 37263412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Accuracy of zygomatic dental implant placement using computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems compared with a mixed reality appliance. An in vitro study. González-Rueda JR; Galparsoro-Catalán A; de Paz-Hermoso VM; Riad-Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato-Mourelo J; Hernández-Montero S; Montero-Martín J J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e1035-e1044. PubMed ID: 38186921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]