These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39244520)
1. Optimizing concrete for circularity: a comparative life cycle assessment of geopolymer and ordinary concrete. Bamshad O; Ramezanianpour AM Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Sep; 31(43):55788-55811. PubMed ID: 39244520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete produced from industrial side streams in comparison with traditional concrete. Munir Q; Abdulkareem M; Horttanainen M; Kärki T Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 865():161230. PubMed ID: 36586686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Properties and Applications of Geopolymer Composites: A Review Study of Mechanical and Microstructural Properties. Saeed A; Najm HM; Hassan A; Sabri MMS; Qaidi S; Mashaan NS; Ansari K Materials (Basel); 2022 Nov; 15(22):. PubMed ID: 36431736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Reinforced Foam and Geopolymer Concretes against Prolonged Exposures to Chloride in a Normal Environment. Wasim M; Roychand R; Barnes RT; Talevski J; Law D; Li J; Saberian M Materials (Basel); 2022 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 36614488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study on environmental performance of 3D printing and conventional casting of concrete products with industrial wastes. Liu S; Lu B; Li H; Pan Z; Jiang J; Qian S Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 298():134310. PubMed ID: 35301991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic multiscale models to predict the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at various mixture proportions and curing regimes. Ahmed HU; Mohammed AS; Mohammed AA; Faraj RH PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253006. PubMed ID: 34125869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential utilization of waste plastic in sustainable geopolymer concrete production: A review. Panda S; Nanda A; Panigrahi SK J Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 366():121705. PubMed ID: 38972192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical Properties of Rubberised Geopolymer Concrete. Hassan MK; Ibrahim MI; Shill SK; Al-Deen S Materials (Basel); 2024 Feb; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 38473503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytical Review of Geopolymer Concrete: Retrospective and Current Issues. Meskhi B; Beskopylny AN; Stel'makh SA; Shcherban' EM; Mailyan LR; Shilov AA; El'shaeva D; Shilova K; Karalar M; Aksoylu C; Özkılıç YO Materials (Basel); 2023 May; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 37241419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental investigation of quarry rock dust incorporated fly ash and slag based fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete circular columns. Waqas RM; Alkharisi MK; Alsuhaibani E; Butt F; Shabbir F Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):20953. PubMed ID: 39251791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fatigue analysis of ambient-cured geopolymer concrete for high-traffic pavements. Rambabu D; Sharma SK; Akbar MA Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39039367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Life Cycle Assessment and Impact Correlation Analysis of Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete. Shi X; Zhang C; Liang Y; Luo J; Wang X; Feng Y; Li Y; Wang Q; Abomohra AE Materials (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 34885528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing life cycle sustainability: A comprehensive review of concrete produced from construction waste fine fractions. Munir Q; Lahtela V; Kärki T; Koivula A J Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 366():121734. PubMed ID: 38981256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Life Cycle Assessment of Completely Recyclable Concrete. De Schepper M; Van den Heede P; Van Driessche I; De Belie N Materials (Basel); 2014 Aug; 7(8):6010-6027. PubMed ID: 28788174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential for Recycling Metakaolin/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete of Various Strength Levels in Freeze-Thaw Conditions. Liu M; Liu H; Hua M; Chen C; Wang X; Guo X; Ma T Materials (Basel); 2024 Apr; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 38730751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental evaluation of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA. Turk J; Cotič Z; Mladenovič A; Šajna A Waste Manag; 2015 Nov; 45():194-205. PubMed ID: 26143535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sustainability assessment methods for circular bio-based building materials: A literature review. Le DL; Salomone R; Nguyen QT J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 352():120137. PubMed ID: 38266527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical Properties of a Sustainable Low-Carbon Geopolymer Concrete Using a Pumice-Derived Sodium Silicate Solution. Oti J; Adeleke BO; Anowie FX; Kinuthia JM; Ekwulo E Materials (Basel); 2024 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 38673149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]