These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39251566)

  • 1. Target-distractor similarity predicts visual search efficiency but only for highly similar features.
    Chapman AF; Störmer VS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Aug; 86(6):1872-1882. PubMed ID: 39251566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
    Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distractor similarity and category variability effects in search.
    Robbins A; Evdokimov A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Oct; 86(7):2231-2250. PubMed ID: 38982007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.
    Töllner T; Conci M; Müller HJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Mar; 36(3):935-44. PubMed ID: 25351495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature similarity is non-linearly related to attentional selection: Evidence from visual search and sustained attention tasks.
    Chapman AF; Störmer VS
    J Vis; 2022 Jul; 22(8):4. PubMed ID: 35834377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature-based attention warps the perception of visual features.
    Chapman AF; Chunharas C; Störmer VS
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6487. PubMed ID: 37081047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of background color on asymmetries in color search.
    Rosenholtz R; Nagy AL; Bell NR
    J Vis; 2004 Mar; 4(3):224-40. PubMed ID: 15086312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.