These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3925259)

  • 21. Providing letters and audiotapes to supplement a prenatal diagnostic consultation: effects on later distress and recall.
    Cope CD; Lyons AC; Donovan V; Rylance M; Kilby MD
    Prenat Diagn; 2003 Dec; 23(13):1060-7. PubMed ID: 14691993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A conceptual explanation of risk-reduction behavior and intervention development.
    Cox CL; Sullivan JA; Roghmann KJ
    Nurs Res; 1984; 33(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 6563535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving comprehension of informed consent.
    Kusec S; Oresković S; Skegro M; Korolija D; Busić Z; Horzić M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Mar; 60(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 16427762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Creating value-focused healthcare delivery systems: Part three--Core competencies.
    Beveridge RN
    J Oncol Manag; 1997; 6(6):16-23. PubMed ID: 10174597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening?
    Santalahti P; Aro AR; Hemminki E; Helenius H; Ryynänen M
    Prenat Diagn; 1998 Feb; 18(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 9516017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Information disclosure when screening for trisomy 21: a decision-making aid for pregnant women?].
    Seror V; Aymé S
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Feb; 30(1 Suppl):80-4. PubMed ID: 11240521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The prudent use of diagnostic ultrasound. British Institute of Radiology presidential address 1986.
    Wells PN
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Dec; 59(708):1143-51. PubMed ID: 3099878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of "anticipated decision regret".
    Tymstra T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1989; 5(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 10303487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Research strategies for the use of imaging ultrasound as an obstetric screening tool.
    Thacker SB
    Birth; 1986 Mar; 13(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3513786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Who should pay for doctor support services?
    Williams HJ
    BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1417. PubMed ID: 25787291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying patient preferences for diabetes care: A protocol for implementing a discrete choice experiment in Samoa.
    Rivara AC; Galárraga O; Selu M; Arorae M; Wang R; Faasalele-Savusa K; Rosen R; Hawley NL; Viali S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295845. PubMed ID: 38134044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Willingness to pay for medical care and its determinants in private health care facilities among Gondar city residents, Northwest Ethiopia: Cross sectional study.
    Belete GT; Walle Y
    Heliyon; 2023 Nov; 9(11):e21143. PubMed ID: 37942170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differential Willingness to Pay for Kidney Transplantation From Living and Deceased Donors: Empirical Study Among End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) Patients.
    Gonen LD; Bokek-Cohen Y; Azuri P; Tarabeih M
    Inquiry; 2022; 59():469580221139368. PubMed ID: 36484339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
    Bennette CS; Trinidad SB; Fullerton SM; Patrick D; Amendola L; Burke W; Hisama FM; Jarvik GP; Regier DA; Veenstra DL
    Genet Med; 2013 Nov; 15(11):873-81. PubMed ID: 23722871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.
    Lynn FA; Crealey GE; Alderdice FA; McElnay JC
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):892-903. PubMed ID: 23527851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantifying the economic burden of malaria in Nigeria using the willingness to pay approach.
    Jimoh A; Sofola O; Petu A; Okorosobo T
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2007 May; 5():6. PubMed ID: 17517146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Defining monetary values for quality of life improvements: an exploratory study.
    Lachaine J; Laurier C; Contandriopoulos AP
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(12):865-74. PubMed ID: 12908842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of willingness to pay to assess public preferences towards the fortification of foodstuffs with folic acid.
    Dixon S; Shackley P
    Health Expect; 2003 Jun; 6(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 12752742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychological benefits of prostate cancer screening: the role of reassurance.
    Cantor SB; Volk RJ; Cass AR; Gilani J; Spann SJ
    Health Expect; 2002 Jun; 5(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12031051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Willingness to pay and the valuation of programmes for the prevention and control of influenza.
    Birch S; Gafni A; O'Brien B
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1999; 16 Suppl 1():55-61. PubMed ID: 10623377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.