These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3925308)

  • 21. Physical factors affecting absorbed dose to the skin from cobalt-60 gamma rays and 25-MV x rays.
    Gagnon WF; Horton JL
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 113655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An anatomically realistic lung model for Monte Carlo-based dose calculations.
    Liang L; Larsen EW; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1013-25. PubMed ID: 17441248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
    Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tenth value layers for 60Co gamma rays and for 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV x rays in concrete for beams of cone angles between 0 degrees and 14 degrees calculated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Jaradat AK; Biggs PJ
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 17429304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pitfalls in the use of high energy X rays to treat tumors in the lung.
    Ekstrand KE; Barnes WH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Jan; 18(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 2105286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigations of different kilovoltage X-ray energy for three-dimensional converging stereotactic radiotherapy system: Monte Carlo simulations with CT data.
    Deloar HM; Kunieda E; Kawase T; Tsunoo T; Saitoh H; Ozaki M; Saito K; Takagi S; Sato O; Fujisaki T; Myojoyama A; Sorell G
    Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4635-42. PubMed ID: 17278816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of the dose at the maze entrance for x-rays from radiotherapy linear accelerators.
    Al-Affan IA
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 10659762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A correction-based dose calculation algorithm for kilovoltage x rays.
    Ding GX; Pawlowski JM; Coffey CW
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5312-6. PubMed ID: 19175090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
    Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implications of computed tomography for inhomogeneity corrections in photon beam dose calculations.
    Sontag MR; Battista JJ; Bronskill MJ; Cunningham JR
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 405707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement and evaluation of inhomogeneity corrections and monitor unit verification for treatment planning.
    Saxena R; Higgins P
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 19931010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dose corrections for low-density tissue inhomogeneities and air channels for 10-MV x rays.
    Young ME; Kornelsen RO
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 6888356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 10-MV x-ray primary and scatter dose calculation using convolutions.
    Iwasaki A
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2333047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accounting for primary electron scatter in x-ray beam convolution calculations.
    Keall P; Hoban P
    Med Phys; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1413-8. PubMed ID: 8531866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
    Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of air-cavity inhomogeneity effects for cobalt-60, 6-, and 10-MV x-ray beams.
    Beach JL; Mendiondo MS; Mendiondo OA
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 3104739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs.
    Chibani O; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.