235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3926117)
1. The Warnock report.
Warnock M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ethics of embryo research: not as easy as it sounds.
Annas GJ
Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):138-40, 148. PubMed ID: 3645222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
Gregoratos B
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research on human embryos--a justification.
Brown J
J Med Ethics; 1986 Dec; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 3806632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Warnock versus Powell (and Harradine): when does potentiality count?
Lockwood M
Bioethics; 1988 Jul; 2(3):187-213. PubMed ID: 11659014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
Connor S
New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryo research.
Robertson JA
Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986; 24(1):15-37. PubMed ID: 11658730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban.
Clarke M
Nature; 1985 Feb; 313(6004):618. PubMed ID: 11658513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Warnock report on human fertilization and embryology.
J Adv Nurs; 1985 Jul; 10(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 3850104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
Gillon R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment.
Van de Weghe B
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A welcome report.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jul; 289(6439):207-8. PubMed ID: 6430410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ETHICS, EMBRYOS, AND EVIDENCE: A LOOK BACK AT WARNOCK.
Hammond-Browning N
Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(4):588-619. PubMed ID: 26232721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimenting and the new biology: "a consummation devoutly to be wished".
Scott R
Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):123-8. PubMed ID: 3645219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Confused comment on Warnock.
Nature; 1984 Nov 29-Dec 5; 312(5993):389. PubMed ID: 6504148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do human cells have rights?
Warnock M
Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Government looks for guidance through Warnock minefield.
Deitch R
Lancet; 1984 Nov; 2(8411):1107-8. PubMed ID: 11644294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Embryos untouched.
Nature; 1985 Feb 21-27; 313(6004):612. PubMed ID: 3974693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science and family in the great embryo debate.
Mulkay M
Sociology; 1994 Aug; 28(3):699-715. PubMed ID: 11658100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing minds about embryo research.
Mulkay M
Public Underst Sci; 1994; 3():195-213. PubMed ID: 11659865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
