These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3927186)

  • 1. Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.
    Velaj R; Drayer B; Albright R; Fram E
    Neurology; 1985 Sep; 35(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 3927186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of blood-brain barrier disruption by intracarotid iopamidol and methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Sage MR; Wilcox J; Evill CA; Benness GT
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(4):893-5. PubMed ID: 6410875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Bird CR; Drayer BP; Velaj R; Triolo PJ; Allen S; Bates M; Yeates AE; Heinz ER; Osborne DR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 6437183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Partridge JB; Robinson PJ; Turnbull CM; Stoker JB; Boyle RM; Morrison GW
    Clin Radiol; 1981 Jul; 32(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 6972848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon.
    Rao VM; Rao AK; Steiner RM; Burka ER; Grainger RG; Ballas SK
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 7089282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the cardiovascular responses to carotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Morris TW; Francis M; Fischer HW
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 468493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiovascular effects induced by the injection of a new nonionic contrast medium (Iopamidol): experimental study in dogs.
    Di Donato M; Bongrani S; Cucchini F; Baldi G; Fappani A; Colla B; Visioli O
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 489271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knee arthrography: effects of various contrast media and epinephrine on synovial fluid.
    Corbetti F; Malatesta V; Camposampiero A; Mazzi A; Punzi L; Angelini F; Vigo M; Todesco S
    Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 3763866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different effect of diatrizoate and iopamidol on prostaglandin synthesis in perfused hamster lungs.
    Paajanen H; Uotila P; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 6413449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of blood-brain barrier disruption in the rabbit following intracarotid iopamidol and methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Wycherley AG; Wilcox J; Sage MR
    Australas Radiol; 1984 Nov; 28(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 6535564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iopamidol compared with Conray in peripheral angiography.
    Wojciechowski J; Johansson R; Björk L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 6763456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulmonary angiography with iopamidol and Renografin 76 in normal and pulmonary hypertensive dogs.
    Thompson WM; Mills SR; Bates M; Hedlund L; Rommel J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1983; 24(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 6666667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography.
    Widrich WC; Beckman CF; Robbins AH; Scholz FJ; Srinivasan MK; Hayes EJ; Kellum CD; Newman T
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 6344138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamate.
    Lea Thomas M; Keeling FP; Piaggio RB; Treweeke PS
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):205-7. PubMed ID: 6365232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Renal tubular damage after rapid intravenous contrast study with iopamidol].
    Stratta P; Porcellini G; Bianchi SD; Granone A; Gatti G; Salomone M; Ragni R
    Minerva Med; 1981 Jul; 72(28):1859-62. PubMed ID: 7254634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absence of myocardial biochemical toxicity with a nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol).
    Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Neese RA; Morris DL
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 4036786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of a new non-ionic contrast medium on left ventricular volume measurements in the dog].
    Fappani A; Di Donato M; Bongrani S; Baldi G; Effendy FN; Cucchini F
    Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1978; 23(3):550-8. PubMed ID: 753363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.