These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39277853)
1. [Digital 3D tomosynthesis in the diagnosis and screening of breast cancer]. Tasnádi T Orv Hetil; 2024 Sep; 165(37):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 39277853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related. Sommer A; Weigel S; Hense HW; Gerß J; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Nekolla E; Lenzen H; Heindel W; Eur Radiol; 2025 Jan; 35(1):166-176. PubMed ID: 39012526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric Breast Density Estimation From Three-Dimensional Reconstructed Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Using Deep Learning. Ahluwalia VS; Doiphode N; Mankowski WC; Cohen EA; Pati S; Pantalone L; Bakas S; Brooks A; Vachon CM; Conant EF; Gastounioti A; Kontos D JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2024 Dec; 8():e2400103. PubMed ID: 39652797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Imaging: what women & healthcare professionals need to know. Seely JM; Doherty A; Bissell MB Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2025; 54(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 39608932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective Study of Supplemental Screening With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Women With Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer: Results of the Prevalence Round. Patel BK; Carnahan MB; Northfelt D; Anderson K; Mazza GL; Pizzitola VJ; Giurescu ME; Lorans R; Eversman WG; Sharpe RE; Harper LK; Apsey H; Cronin P; Kling J; Ernst B; Palmieri J; Fraker J; Mina L; Batalini F; Pockaj B J Clin Oncol; 2024 Nov; 42(32):3826-3836. PubMed ID: 39058970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in Reader Performance During Sequential Reading of Breast Cancer Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Examinations. Abbey CK; Bandos AI; Parthasarathy MK; Webster MA; Zuley ML Radiology; 2024 Nov; 313(2):e232885. PubMed ID: 39530892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast density effect on the sensitivity of digital screening mammography in a UK cohort. Payne NR; Hickman SE; Black R; Priest AN; Hudson S; Gilbert FJ Eur Radiol; 2025 Jan; 35(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 39017933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma. Onega T; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Henderson LM; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson ANA; Weaver D; Sprague BL; Bowles EJA; di Florio-Alexander RM Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Dec; 202(3):505-514. PubMed ID: 37697031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Content of official addressed to women informative documents about breast cancer screening in Spain]. Ballesteros-Peña S; Gavilán-Moral E Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2018 Oct; 92():. PubMed ID: 30361472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening. Cole EB; Pisano ED Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 26472036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Baseline Performance of Ultrasound-Based Strategies in Breast Cancer Screening Among Chinese Women. Xu HF; Wang H; Liu Y; Wang XY; Guo XL; Liu HW; Kang RH; Chen Q; Liu SZ; Guo LW; Zheng LY; Qiao YL; Zhang SK Acad Radiol; 2024 Dec; 31(12):4772-4779. PubMed ID: 39174359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating ten years of breast cancer screening with contrast enhanced mammography in women with Intermediate-high risk. Sorin V; Rahman N; Halabi N; Barash Y; Klang E; Sklair-Levy M Eur J Radiol; 2024 Dec; 181():111807. PubMed ID: 39509749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice. Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Imaging: How Does It Fit into Preoperative Evaluation and Surveillance? Eghtedari M; Tsai C; Robles J; Blair SL; Ojeda-Fournier H Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2018 Jan; 27(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 29132564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials. Houssami N; Lång K; Bernardi D; Tagliafico A; Zackrisson S; Skaane P Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():119-34. PubMed ID: 27017251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-CT Microcalcification Analysis: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Potential in Breast Cancer Research. Brahimetaj R; Cornelis J; Jansen B Tomography; 2024 Oct; 10(11):1716-1729. PubMed ID: 39590935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection in dense breasts? A retrospective preliminary study with comparable results. Ramli Hamid MT; Ab Mumin N; Abdul Hamid S; Ahmad Saman MS; Rahmat K Clin Radiol; 2024 Apr; 79(4):e524-e531. PubMed ID: 38267349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation Between Phyllodes Tumor and Fibroadenoma of the Breast: A Radiomics Prediction Model Based on Full-Field Digital Mammography & Digital Tomosynthesis. Zeng F; Zeng H; Yang J; Huang D; Liu J; Wen C; Qin G; Liao S; Chen W; Xu W; Wang S Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2024; 23():15330338241289474. PubMed ID: 39376181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The distribution and determinants of mammographic density measures in Western Australian aboriginal women. McLean K; Darcey E; Cadby G; Lund H; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson S; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 30819215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]