These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39279066)

  • 1. Chemo mechanical caries removal CMCR: Efficacy of Carisolv gel in primary molar teeth.
    Pervez J; Adil HM; Rana M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2024 Sep; 74(9):1630-1633. PubMed ID: 39279066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.
    Gulzar S; Arora R; Shah AH; Bhardwaj B; Abusalim G; Khalil HS; Wyne AH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 27965492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Shetty PK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 26(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11688813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemo-mechanical dentine caries removal with Carisolv using a rotating brush.
    Meller C; Nourallah AW; Heyduck C; Steffen H; Splieth CH
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jun; 7(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16842027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv.
    Hosein T; Hasan A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Apr; 18(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 18474155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lai G; Lara Capi C; Cocco F; Cagetti MG; Lingström P; Almhöjd U; Campus G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):569-80. PubMed ID: 25772193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro effectiveness of a chemo-mechanical method for caries removal.
    Peric T; Markovic D
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2007 Jun; 8(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 17571929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strength of caries-affected human dentine after three different caries removal techniques.
    Sirin Karaarslan E; Yildiz E; Cebe MA; Yegin Z; Ozturk B
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):793-801. PubMed ID: 22687577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro evaluation of microtensile bond strengths of two adhesive bonding agents to residual dentine after caries removal using three excavation techniques.
    Banerjee A; Kellow S; Mannocci F; Cook RJ; Watson TF
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):480-9. PubMed ID: 20223273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to make choice of the carious removal methods, Carisolv or traditional drilling? A meta-analysis.
    Li R; Zhao Y; Ye L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 41(6):432-42. PubMed ID: 24661083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.
    Flückiger L; Waltimo T; Stich H; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. A multi-centre study.
    Ericson D; Zimmerman M; Raber H; Götrick B; Bornstein R; Thorell J
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 10207191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study.
    Viral PM; Nagarathna C; Shakuntala BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23855171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv).
    Lozano-Chourio MA; Zambrano O; González H; Quero M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 May; 16(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16643536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of residual dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechanical caries removal with Carisolv.
    Splieth C; Rosin M; Gellissen B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Dec; 5(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 11800438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
    Kirzioglu Z; Gurbuz T; Yilmaz Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16969657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of a new method of caries removal: in vivo study].
    Lumbau A; Lai Bachisio S; Lai C; Lai V
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 12686909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Chemo-mechanical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments].
    Beeley JA; Yip HK; Stevenson AG
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Jul; 108(7):277-81. PubMed ID: 11486517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. X-ray microtomography study to validate the efficacies of caries removal in primary molars by hand excavation and chemo-mechanical technique.
    Ahmed M; Davis GR; Wong FS
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 22922542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal.
    Yazici AR; Atílla P; Ozgünaltay G; Müftüoglu S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Dec; 30(12):1177-82. PubMed ID: 14641660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.