These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39281788)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of microleakage and penetration depth of ACP containing pit and fissure sealant and flowable composite - An
    Bartaria P; Sharma P; Sogi HP; Jain M; Shahi P; Kapoor R
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Aug; 16(8):e1027-e1032. PubMed ID: 39281788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage and Depth of Penetration of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Butail A; Dua P; Mangla R; Saini S; Chauhan A; Rana S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 32581477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.
    Arastoo S; Behbudi A; Rakhshan V
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 31608333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Penetration Depth and Microleakage of Different Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Dye Penetration Method: An
    Dixit A; Awasthi N; Jha S; Suprakasam S; Penumatsa NV; Vijayan AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):890-893. PubMed ID: 34753840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of nanocomposites as pit and fissure sealants in child patients.
    Singh S; Pandey RK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 22016312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth.
    Rahimian-Imam S; Ramazani N; Fayazi MR
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Jun; 12(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 26884777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM and microleakage evaluation of 3 flowable composites as sealants without using bonding agents.
    Kwon HB; Park KT
    Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16615375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of two materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Soleymani A; Heydari Z
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2011; 5(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 22991611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of Healozone on microleakage and fissure penetration of different sealing materials.
    Dukić W; Dukić OL; Milardović S
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Mar; 33(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 19408619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the effect of three fissure preparation techniques on microleakage of a colored flowable composite used as a fissure sealant.
    Eliacik BK; Karahan M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):119-129. PubMed ID: 37997243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage and sealant penetration in contaminated carious fissures.
    Hevinga MA; Opdam NJ; Frencken JE; Bronkhorst EM; Truin GJ
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):909-14. PubMed ID: 17961903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Pit & Fissure Sealants and a Restorative Material to check their Microleakage - An In Vitro Study.
    Joshi K; Dave B; Joshi N; Rajashekhara B; Jobanputra LH; Yagnik K
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Aug; 5(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 24155619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of microleakage of two materials used as fissure sealants with different methods: an in vitro study.
    Tehrani MH; Birjandi N; Nasr E; Shahtusi M
    Int J Prev Med; 2014 Feb; 5(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 24627743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants.
    Pardi V; Sinhoreti MA; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM; Meneghim Mde C
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 16721465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, a Self-Adhesive Fissure Sealant and a Conventional Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth with/without Saliva Contamination.
    Hosseinipour ZS; Heidari A; Shahrabi M; Poorzandpoush K
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(4):239-247. PubMed ID: 32342052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage and penetration depth of different fissure sealant materials after cyclic thermo-mechanic and brushing simulation.
    Hatirli H; Yasa B; Yasa E
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jan; 37(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28845033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Sealing Ability of two Commercially Available Pit and Fissure Sealants.
    Sridhar LP; Moses J; Rangeeth BN; Sivakumar S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Sep; 10(9):ZC01-ZC04. PubMed ID: 27790568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar.
    Gawali PN; Chaugule VB; Panse AM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(4):291-295. PubMed ID: 28127158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An
    Singh C; Kaur K; Kapoor K
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 31710012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Pit and Fissure Sealant Application to Reduce Microleakage.
    Patil P; Padmawar NS; Girdhar D; Singh S; Shah YD; Gupta S
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54984. PubMed ID: 38550456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.