These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39282772)
1. Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems - A Finite Element Analysis. Awaradi M; Sagarkar RM; Shivamurthy PG; Mathew S; Sabrish S; Bhaduri N Indian J Dent Res; 2024 Apr; 35(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 39282772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations. Monteiro MR; Silva LE; Elias CN; Vilella Ode V J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of bracket-slot design on the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium alignment wires in different deflection configurations. Nucera R; Gatto E; Borsellino C; Aceto P; Fabiano F; Matarese G; Perillo L; Cordasco G Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 24067050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations. Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire. Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial. Ahmed AS; Al-Nimri KS; Ahmed WS Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires. Leite VV; Lopes MB; Gonini Júnior A; Almeida MR; Moura SK; Almeida RR Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forces released by nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of buccally displaced teeth. Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Giuntini V Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):316.e1-6; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 19732660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment on the Precision of the Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Using Micro-computed Tomography (Micro-CT). Alqahtani ND J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 34002705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs. Yeh CL; Kusnoto B; Viana G; Evans CA; Drummond JL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e11-22. PubMed ID: 17561042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces. Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets. Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys. Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]