These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39283223)
1. Clinical and histological efficacy of a new implant surface in achieving early and stable osseointegration: An in vivo study. Nevins M; Chen CY; Khang W; Kim DM Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2024 Sep; 17(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 39283223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible. Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs. Calvo-Guirado JL; López-López PJ; Mate Sanchez JE; Gargallo Albiol J; Velasco Ortega E; Delgado Ruiz R Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 24118345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Kohal RJ; Mellas P; Hürzeler MB; Trejo PM; Morrison E; Caffesse RG J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 9736376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs. Valderrama P; Bornstein MM; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom FL; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1025-34. PubMed ID: 21142981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential healing events of osseointegration at UnicCa(®) and SLActive(®) implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog. Favero R; Lang NP; Salata LA; Martins Neto EC; Caroprese M; Botticelli D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 25818234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of implant microstructure on the osseointegration of immediate implants placed in periodontally infected sites. A histomorphometric study in dogs. Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Grisi MF; Souza SS; Taba M; Kajiwara JK Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 14731175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential healing at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Mainetti T; Lang NP; Bengazi F; Favero V; Soto Cantero L; Botticelli D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jan; 27(1):130-8. PubMed ID: 25521008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of dental implants in extraction sockets preserved with porous titanium granules - an experimental study. Verket A; Lyngstadaas SP; Rønold HJ; Wohlfahrt JC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e100-8. PubMed ID: 23190181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs. Al-Hamdan K; Al-Moaber SH; Junker R; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 21561482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite Surface in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: A Multiparameter Animal Study in Low-Density Bone. Sartoretto SC; Calasans-Maia J; Resende R; Câmara E; Ghiraldini B; Barbosa Bezerra FJ; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia MD Int J Nanomedicine; 2020; 15():8803-8817. PubMed ID: 33204089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of light/chemically hardened polymethylmethacrylate, polyhydroxylethylmethacrylate, and calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around implants and extraction sockets in minipigs: Part II: histologic and micro-CT evaluations. Hasturk H; Kantarci A; Ghattas M; Dangaria SJ; Abdallah R; Morgan EF; Diekwisch TG; Ashman A; Van Dyke T J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1230-9. PubMed ID: 24502615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo evaluation of biofunctionalized implant surfaces with a synthetic peptide (P-15) and its impact on osseointegration. A preclinical animal study. Schmitt CM; Koepple M; Moest T; Neumann K; Weisel T; Schlegel KA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1339-1348. PubMed ID: 26567087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface characteristics of implants influence their bone integration after simultaneous placement of implant and GBR membrane. Lima LA; Fuchs-Wehrle AM; Lang NP; Hämmerle CH; Liberti E; Pompeu E; Todescan JH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Dec; 14(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 15015941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone morphology changes around two types of bone-level implants installed in fresh extraction sockets--a histomorphometric study in Beagle dogs. Alharbi HM; Babay N; Alzoman H; Basudan S; Anil S; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1106-12. PubMed ID: 24690000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]