These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39287527)
1. Implications of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: Reducing Advanced Breast Cancers. Kim SY; Woo OH Radiology; 2024 Sep; 312(3):e242008. PubMed ID: 39287527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. Helvie MA Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):917-29. PubMed ID: 20868894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can digital breast tomosynthesis decrease interval cancers in a breast cancer screening program? Mullen LA Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5425-5426. PubMed ID: 38319429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial. Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C; Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: Is independent double reading still required? Weigel S; Hense HW; Weyer-Elberich V; Gerss J; Heindel W Rofo; 2024 Aug; 196(8):834-842. PubMed ID: 38295824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography. Dang PA; Wang A; Senapati GM; Ip IK; Lacson R; Khorasani R; Giess CS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):701-706. PubMed ID: 31613659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tomosynthesis Impact on Breast Cancer Screening in Patients Younger Than 50 Years Old. Rose SL; Shisler JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1401-1404. PubMed ID: 29629810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Young KC Clin Radiol; 2016 Feb; 71(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 26707815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice. Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Nonimplant-displaced Views May Be Safely Omitted at Screening Mammography. Fields BKK; Joe BN Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2024 Jul; 6(4):e249014. PubMed ID: 38940690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis. ; ; Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2014 Jan; 28(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 24730082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study. Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography. Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice. Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Johnson MM Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]