These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39289653)
1. Impact of different activation procedures on sodium hypochlorite penetration into dentinal tubules after endodontic retreatment via confocal laser scanning microscopy. Gunes B; Yeter KY; Altay Y BMC Oral Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):1103. PubMed ID: 39289653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals. Moon YM; Kim HC; Bae KS; Baek SH; Shon WJ; Lee W J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 22414844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of final irrigation regimen on sealer penetration in curved root canals. Moon YM; Shon WJ; Baek SH; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee W J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):732-6. PubMed ID: 20307754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different final irrigation solutions on dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of root canal sealer. Kara Tuncer A; Tuncer S J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):860-3. PubMed ID: 22595128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of three different retreatment techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil: a scanning electron microscope study. Pirani C; Pelliccioni GA; Marchionni S; Montebugnoli L; Piana G; Prati C J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1433-40. PubMed ID: 19801246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study. Akcay M; Arslan H; Durmus N; Mese M; Capar ID Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 26774730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Different Agitation Techniques on the Penetration of Irrigant and Sealer into Dentinal Tubules. Gu Y; Perinpanayagam H; Kum DJ; Yoo YJ; Jeong JS; Lim SM; Chang SW; Baek SH; Zhu Q; Kum KY Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Feb; 35(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 27929924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of obturation technique on penetration of calcium silicate-based sealer into dentinal tubules after endodontic retreatment of mandibular premolars. Martins MP; de Andrade FB; Bramante CM; Vivan RR; Limoeiro AG; Nascimento WM; Duarte MAH Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Dec; 26(12):7143-7148. PubMed ID: 35972652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of chitosan on sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules. Kesim B; Burak AK; Ustun Y; Delikan E; Gungor A Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1284-1290. PubMed ID: 30297560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. Kuçi A; Alaçam T; Yavaş O; Ergul-Ulger Z; Kayaoglu G J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1627-31. PubMed ID: 25260735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the efficacy of three different supplementary cleaning protocols in root-filled teeth with a bioceramic sealer after retreatment-a micro-computed tomographic study. Sinsareekul C; Hiran-Us S Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Apr; 26(4):3515-3521. PubMed ID: 34854988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of agitation/activation strategies on the antibiofilm potential of sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture in vitro. Cai M; Cai Y; Yang R; Xu Z; Neelakantan P; Wei X BMC Oral Health; 2022 May; 22(1):201. PubMed ID: 35606751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To evaluate and compare the effect of 17% EDTA, 10% citric acid, 7% maleic acid on the dentinal tubule penetration depth of bio ceramic root canal sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy: an Shekhar S; Mallya PL; Ballal V; Shenoy R F1000Res; 2022; 11():1561. PubMed ID: 36875990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effects of Different Agitation Techniques of Canal Irrigant on Tubular Penetration of a Bioceramic Sealer. Zand V; Salem Milani A; Yavari HR; Majidi AR Iran Endod J; 2019; 14(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 36794108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of different irrigation activation methods on root canal treatment of primary teeth. Avcı M; Şermet Elbay Ü; Kaşıkçı S J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 48(3):156-165. PubMed ID: 38755994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of different final irrigation techniques and placement of endodontic sealer into dentinal tubules. Oliveira KV; Silva BMD; Leonardi DP; Crozeta BM; Sousa-Neto MD; Baratto-Filho F; Gabardo MCL Braz Oral Res; 2017 Dec; 31():e114. PubMed ID: 29267675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of different irrigation activation methods on the penetration of the irrigation solution into the dentinal tubules in teeth with calcium hydroxide applied and oval-shaped canals: Confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. Er Karaoğlu G; Aydın ZU Microsc Res Tech; 2024 Sep; 87(9):2194-2203. PubMed ID: 38716871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of dentinal crack propagation, amount of gutta percha remaining and time required during removal of gutta percha using two different rotary instruments and hand instruments - An Tejaswi S; Singh A; Manglekar S; Ambikathanaya UK; Shetty S Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):524-530. PubMed ID: 35439914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Various Laser-Activated Irrigation Protocols on Endodontic Sealer Penetration into the Dentinal Tubules: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study. Cheng X; Wang X; Liu N; Guan Q; Yu Q; He W Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2021 Aug; 39(8):544-549. PubMed ID: 34339326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]