These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3929316)
1. Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases. Swedberg MD; Järbe TU Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 86(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 3929316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Effects of apomorphine, haloperidol, procaine and other drugs. Järbe TU Neuropharmacology; 1984 Aug; 23(8):899-907. PubMed ID: 6090966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drug discrimination procedures: differential characteristics of the drug A vs drug B and the drug A vs drug B vs no drug cases. Swedberg MD; Järbe TU Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 90(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 3097722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine in pigeons. Järbe TU Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):671-5. PubMed ID: 6294675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increasing the selectivity of drug discrimination procedures. Appel JB; West WB; Rolandi WG; Alici T; Pechersky K Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 10515312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of sequential drug discriminations under fixed-interval schedules for long time periods without training. Li M; McMillan DE Eur J Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 476(1-2):79-85. PubMed ID: 12969752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations. Li M; Wessinger WD; McMillan DE J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 16156138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drug discrimination and generalization in pigeons. Leberer MR; Fowler SC Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1977 Nov; 7(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 594094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of drug discrimination history on drug discrimination and on punished and unpunished responding. Li M; McMillan DE Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Sep; 61(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 9715811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of drug discrimination history on the generalization of pentobarbital to other drugs. McMillan DE; Sun WL; Hardwick WC J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1996 Jul; 278(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 8764335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Drug discrimination using a Pavlovian conditional discrimination paradigm in pigeons. Parker BK; Schaal DW; Miller M Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Dec; 49(4):955-60. PubMed ID: 7886113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drug effects on the repeated generalization of a visual discrimination acquired under one trial per day conditions. Nielsen EB; Rolandi W; Appel JB Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1984; 82(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 6425906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Four-choice drug discrimination in pigeons. Li M; McMillan DE Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 12(8):621-8. PubMed ID: 11856899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for perceptual masking of the discriminative morphine stimulus. Gauvin DV; Young AM Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 98(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 2502792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cocaine-opioid interactions in groups of rats trained to discriminate different doses of cocaine. Kantak KM; Riberdy A; Spealman RD Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Dec; 147(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 10639683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphine discrimination in the pigeon using a color tracking procedure. Paule MG; Wenger GR Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Mar; 24(3):597-604. PubMed ID: 3703895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrimination of methadone and cocaine by pigeons without explicit discrimination training. Schaal DW; McDonald MP; Miller MA; Reilly MP J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Sep; 66(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8843690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cocaine cue in pigeons: time course studies and generalization to structurally related compounds (norcocaine, WIN 35,428 and 35,065-2) and (+)-amphetamine. Järbe TU Br J Pharmacol; 1981 Aug; 73(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 7272587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the MDA and MDMA optical isomers in a stimulant-hallucinogen discrimination. Baker LE; Taylor MM Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Aug; 57(4):737-48. PubMed ID: 9259001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in pigeons. de la Garza R; Johanson CE Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 85(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3920696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]