BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3929490)

  • 1. [Radiation protection in mammography].
    Rausch L
    Z Lymphol; 1985 Jun; 9(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 3929490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment.
    Mettler FA; Upton AC; Kelsey CA; Ashby RN; Rosenberg RD; Linver MN
    Cancer; 1996 Mar; 77(5):903-9. PubMed ID: 8608482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life.
    Mattsson A; Leitz W; Rutqvist LE
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(1):220-6. PubMed ID: 10638993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mammography screening--neglected aspects of radiation risks].
    Kuni H; Schmitz-Feuerhake I; Dieckmann H
    Gesundheitswesen; 2003 Jul; 65(7):443-6. PubMed ID: 12891476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of benefit cost and risk in the use of mammography].
    Richter B; Rausch L
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1977; 18():82-95. PubMed ID: 414382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Critical notes on the risk/benefit/cost discussion in mammography from the clinical point of view].
    Frischbier HJ; Würthner K
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1977; 18():95-100. PubMed ID: 414383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimated benefits and risks of screening for breast cancer.
    Howe GR; Sherman GJ; Semenciw RM; Miller AB
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 124(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 7011526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recruiting older women for screening mammography.
    Halabi S; Vogel VG; Bondy ML; Vernon SW
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 8402722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of radiation risk from screening mammography: recent trends and comparison with expected benefits.
    Feig SA; Ehrlich SM
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):638-47. PubMed ID: 2305043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand?
    Baker S; Wall M; Bloomfield A
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1221):U1628. PubMed ID: 16138166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for breast cancer: is ionizing radiation among them?
    Golubicic I; Borojevic N; Pavlovic T
    J BUON; 2008; 13(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 19145669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
    Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
    BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology.
    Pauwels EK; Foray N; Bourguignon MH
    Med Princ Pract; 2016; 25(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 26571215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Radiation protection of the patient in nuclear medicine].
    Frischauf H
    Acta Med Austriaca; 1978; 5(4-5):153-5. PubMed ID: 756129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.