These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3930597)
1. The feeding dilemma: In the Matter of Conroy. Plumeri PA J Clin Gastroenterol; 1985 Aug; 7(4):372-4. PubMed ID: 3930597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy, No. A-108 (N.J. Jan. 17, 1985). Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Oct; 1(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 10312027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan. Lynn J Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The case of Claire Conroy: will administrative review safeguard incompetent patients? Lo B; Dornbrand L Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jun; 104(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 3085567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding nutrition and mistrusting nurturance: the vocabulary of In re Conroy. Burt RA Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 3104232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment. Branch JL Health Matrix; 1985-1986 Winter; 3(4):44-7. PubMed ID: 10311942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan. Rouse F Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10183493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients? Emanuel EJ Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8578):170-1. PubMed ID: 2892998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New Jersey's 'right-to-die' cases: a view from the ring. Nevins M Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986 Mar; 6(3):13-6. PubMed ID: 10311536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case. Nevins MA J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Brief and appendix for amicus curiae: the American Geriatrics Society. Lynn J J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Dec; 32(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 6512131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 4008237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Should physicians withhold life-sustaining care from patients who are not terminally ill? Emanuel EJ Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8577):106-8. PubMed ID: 2891943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Conroy decision. Maressa VA N J Med; 1985 Dec; 82(12):957-8. PubMed ID: 3866979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nutrition and hydration as elective therapy: Brophy and Jobes from an ethical and historical perspective. Derr PG Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 3091528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In the matter of Claire C. Conroy. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3850083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A schizophrenic decision on Conroy. Bank LG Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 3700078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Matter of Conroy. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. After Conroy: 'When is enough enough'? Swick T Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1985; 5(7):14-5. PubMed ID: 10272592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]