These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39307658)
1. Has robot-assisted pyeloplasty reached outcome parity with laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children <15 kg? A Paediatric YAU international multi-center study. Bindi E; Cobellis G; 't Hoen LA; Lammers RJM; O'Kelly F; Dönmez Mİ; Baydilli N; Haid B; Marco BB; Atwa A; Madarriaga YQ; Masieri L; Sforza S; J Pediatr Urol; 2024 Dec; 20(6):1154-1159. PubMed ID: 39307658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results. Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party. Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Secondary Management for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction after Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Zhang Y; Ouyang W; Xu H; Luan Y; Yang J; Lu Y; Hu J; Liu Z; Yu X; Guan W; Hu Z; Ye Z; Wang S; Li H Urol Int; 2019; 103(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 31537001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants Aged 12 Months or Less. Wong YS; Pang KKY; Tam YH Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():647139. PubMed ID: 34195160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children. Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Oct; 18(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 36117037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young children. Sun L; Zhao D; Shen Y; Tang D; Chen G; Zhu L; Yang Y; Tao C Asian J Surg; 2023 Feb; 46(2):868-873. PubMed ID: 36192267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children. Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), is an alternative to open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. Cohen S; Raisin G; Dothan D; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1117-1122. PubMed ID: 34859365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: preliminary results of a pilot prospective randomized controlled trial. Silay MS; Danacioglu O; Ozel K; Karaman MI; Caskurlu T World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1841-1848. PubMed ID: 31435732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study. Blanc T; Abbo O; Vatta F; Grosman J; Marquant F; Elie C; Juricic M; Laraqui S; Broch A; Arnaud A Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Jul; 41():134-140. PubMed ID: 35813254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ebert KM; Nicassio L; Alpert SA; Ching CB; Dajusta DG; Fuchs ME; McLeod DJ; Jayanthi VR J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Dec; 16(6):845.e1-845.e6. PubMed ID: 33060019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [COMPARING LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOT-ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY FOR URETERO-PELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION: INITIAL EXPERIENCE FROM A SINGLE CENTER]. Tatenuma T; Ito H; Komeya M; Ito Y; Muraoka K; Hasumi H; Hayashi N; Makiyama K Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2023; 114(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 38246620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants. Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 33812779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: Open or minimally invasive surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cascini V; Lauriti G; Di Renzo D; Miscia ME; Lisi G Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():1052440. PubMed ID: 36507128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]