These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3930964)

  • 1. Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls.
    Dans PE; Weiner JP; Otter SE
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(18):1131-7. PubMed ID: 3930964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program.
    Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Health Care Quality Improvement Program: the WVMI returns to its founding mission.
    Weeks HS
    W V Med J; 1994 Apr; 90(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 8009870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare program; description of the Health Care Financing Administration's evaluation methodology for the Peer Review Organization 5th Scope of Work contracts--HCFA. General notice with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Jul; 62(127):35824-6. PubMed ID: 10169018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does risk-adjusted readmission rate provide valid information on hospital quality?
    Thomas JW
    Inquiry; 1996; 33(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 8883460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between adjusted hospital mortality and the results of peer review.
    Hartz AJ; Gottlieb MS; Kuhn EM; Rimm AA
    Health Serv Res; 1993 Feb; 27(6):765-77. PubMed ID: 8428812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One peer review organization's experience in developing hospital peer groups.
    Sumner BM; Thompson MS; Suarez WG; Davis M; Bell JA; Shanedling SB
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 10135642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The private initiative in PSRO.
    Sanazaro PJ
    Hospitals; 1979 Jan; 53(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 363596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost containment, DRGs, and the ethics of health care. Ethical perspectives on prospective payment.
    Dougherty CJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 2497082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization management as a cost-containment strategy.
    Bailit HL; Sennett C
    Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl; 1991; ():87-93. PubMed ID: 10117120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The PSRO hospital review system.
    Goran MJ; Roberts JS; Kellogg MA; Fielding J; Jessee W
    Med Care; 1975 Apr; 13(4 Suppl):1-33. PubMed ID: 1168294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting hospital readmissions in the Medicare population.
    Anderson GF; Steinberg EP
    Inquiry; 1985; 22(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 2931368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
    Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs.
    Cunningham R
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital.
    Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the principal clinical coordinator in the Health Care Financing Administration's Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative.
    Elward KS; Martin D; Merwin E; Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1994; 2(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10161149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.