These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39312161)

  • 1. Integration of QSAR and NAM in the Read-Across Process for an Effective and Relevant Toxicological Assessment.
    Rovida C; Muscarella M; Locatelli M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2025; 2834():89-111. PubMed ID: 39312161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NAM-supported read-across: From case studies to regulatory guidance in safety assessment.
    Rovida C; Escher SE; Herzler M; Bennekou SH; Kamp H; Kroese DE; Maslankiewicz L; Moné MJ; Patlewicz G; Sipes N; Van Aerts L; White A; Yamada T; Van de Water B
    ALTEX; 2021; 38(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 33452529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.
    Rovida C; Barton-Maclaren T; Benfenati E; Caloni F; Chandrasekera PC; Chesné C; Cronin MTD; De Knecht J; Dietrich DR; Escher SE; Fitzpatrick S; Flannery B; Herzler M; Hougaard Bennekou S; Hubesch B; Kamp H; Kisitu J; Kleinstreuer N; Kovarich S; Leist M; Maertens A; Nugent K; Pallocca G; Pastor M; Patlewicz G; Pavan M; Presgrave O; Smirnova L; Schwarz M; Yamada T; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2020; 37(4):579-606. PubMed ID: 32369604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project.
    Escher SE; Kamp H; Bennekou SH; Bitsch A; Fisher C; Graepel R; Hengstler JG; Herzler M; Knight D; Leist M; Norinder U; Ouédraogo G; Pastor M; Stuard S; White A; Zdrazil B; van de Water B; Kroese D
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 Dec; 93(12):3643-3667. PubMed ID: 31781791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporating lines of evidence from New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to reduce uncertainties in a category based read-across: A case study for repeated dose toxicity.
    Pestana CB; Firman JW; Cronin MTD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 120():104855. PubMed ID: 33359265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 10-step framework for use of read-across (RAX) in next generation risk assessment (NGRA) for cosmetics safety assessment.
    Alexander-White C; Bury D; Cronin M; Dent M; Hack E; Hewitt NJ; Kenna G; Naciff J; Ouedraogo G; Schepky A; Mahony C; Europe C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Mar; 129():105094. PubMed ID: 34990780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating QSAR and read-across for environmental assessment.
    Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A; Petoumenou MI; Cappelli CI; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(7-9):605-18. PubMed ID: 26535447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Substance-tailored testing strategies in toxicology: an in silico methodology based on QSAR modeling of toxicological thresholds and Monte Carlo simulations of toxicological testing.
    Péry AR; Desmots S; Mombelli E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19766156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular Similarity in Predictive Toxicology with a Focus on the q-RASAR Technique.
    Banerjee A; Roy K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2025; 2834():41-63. PubMed ID: 39312159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular Similarity in Computational Toxicology.
    Floris M; Olla S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():171-179. PubMed ID: 29934892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of performance of the profilers provided in the OECD QSAR toolbox for category formation of chemicals.
    Aljallal MA; Chaudhry Q; Price NR
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18330. PubMed ID: 39112641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-modeling-based QSARs for analyzing experimental data on biotransformation and toxicity.
    Soffers AE; Boersma MG; Vaes WH; Vervoort J; Tyrakowska B; Hermens JL; Rietjens IM
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2001; 15(4-5):539-51. PubMed ID: 11566589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of read-across and artificial neural network-based QSAR models for predicting systemic toxicity: A case study for valproic acid.
    Hisaki T; Kaneko MAN; Hirota M; Matsuoka M; Kouzuki H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2020; 45(2):95-108. PubMed ID: 32062621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular similarity in chemical informatics and predictive toxicity modeling: from quantitative read-across (q-RA) to quantitative read-across structure-activity relationship (q-RASAR) with the application of machine learning.
    Banerjee A; Kar S; Roy K; Patlewicz G; Charest N; Benfenati E; Cronin MTD
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2024 Oct; 54(9):659-684. PubMed ID: 39225123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using toxicological evidence from QSAR models in practice.
    Benfenati E; Pardoe S; Martin T; Gonella Diaza R; Lombardo A; Manganaro A; Gissi A
    ALTEX; 2013; 30(1):19-40. PubMed ID: 23338804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metabolomics: a tool for early detection of toxicological effects and an opportunity for biology based grouping of chemicals-from QSAR to QBAR.
    van Ravenzwaay B; Herold M; Kamp H; Kapp MD; Fabian E; Looser R; Krennrich G; Mellert W; Prokoudine A; Strauss V; Walk T; Wiemer J
    Mutat Res; 2012 Aug; 746(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 22305969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ARKA: a framework of dimensionality reduction for machine-learning classification modeling, risk assessment, and data gap-filling of sparse environmental toxicity data.
    Banerjee A; Roy K
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2024 Jun; 26(6):991-1007. PubMed ID: 38743054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Read-across and new approach methodologies applied in a 10-step framework for cosmetics safety assessment - A case study with parabens.
    Ouedraogo G; Alexander-White C; Bury D; Clewell HJ; Cronin M; Cull T; Dent M; Desprez B; Detroyer A; Ellison C; Giammanco S; Hack E; Hewitt NJ; Kenna G; Klaric M; Kreiling R; Lester C; Mahony C; Mombelli E; Naciff J; O'Brien J; Schepky A; Tozer S; van der Burg B; van Vugt-Lussenburg B; Stuard S; Cosmetics Europe
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jul; 132():105161. PubMed ID: 35508214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a unifying strategy for the structure-based prediction of toxicological endpoints.
    Carrió P; Sanz F; Pastor M
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Oct; 90(10):2445-60. PubMed ID: 26553148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty in QSAR predictions.
    Sahlin U
    Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 23614548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.