These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3931856)

  • 1. The Gillick judgment. Contraceptives and the under 16s: House of Lords ruling.
    Dyer C
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Oct; 291(6503):1208-9. PubMed ID: 3931856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Nov 19-Dec 20 (date of decision); 1985(1):533-59. PubMed ID: 11648530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Gillick saga The Gillick saga -- II.
    Williams G
    New Law J; 1985 Nov 22-29; 135(6230 and 6231):1156-1158, 1179-1182. PubMed ID: 11660424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A disturbing judgment by the Court of Appeal.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8419):24-5. PubMed ID: 11644441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consent to treatment by parents and children. Working Group of the Northern Health Region in Current Medical/Ethical Problems.
    Child Care Health Dev; 1986; 12(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 3955796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contraception and the under-16s.
    Lancet; 1985 Apr; 1(8432):827. PubMed ID: 11644482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Professional confidence in relation to young persons who seek treatment concerning pregnancy or contraceptive advice.
    Great Britain. General Medical Council
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8426):470. PubMed ID: 11644443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BMA comments on Gillick judgment.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Oct; 291(6503):1209. PubMed ID: 11653679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DHSS's revised guidance on contraceptive services for young people.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6522):782. PubMed ID: 11658692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Victoria Gillick and the age of consent: a transatlantic view.
    Emson HE
    CMAJ; 1986 Feb; 134(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 3942941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking a lesson from England: the contraceptive controversy.
    Mitchell MJ
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1987; 9(2):499-522. PubMed ID: 11658961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teenage confidence and consent.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6462):144-5. PubMed ID: 3917719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teenagers and contraception.
    Havard JD
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Feb; 292(6519):508-9. PubMed ID: 3081146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The underage girl: a surprising judgment.
    Slack K
    Christ Century; 1985 Nov; 102(36):1054-6. PubMed ID: 11658599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal aspects of consent 8: children under the age of 16 years.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Jun 28-Jul 11; 10(12):797-9. PubMed ID: 11972124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child.
    Austin G
    Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v. Department of Health and Social Security.
    Great Britain. England. House of Lords (5 Feb 1981) [and] Court of Appeal, Civil Division (7 Nov 1980) [and] Queen's Bench Division (31 Jul 1980)
    All Engl Law Rep; 1981 Feb; 1():545-78. PubMed ID: 11648331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limiting Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consent to medical treatment: teenagers and the law.
    Korgaonkar G; Tribe D
    Br J Hosp Med; 1993 Aug 18-31; 50(4):208-9. PubMed ID: 8401905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Under-age contraception--whose responsibility?
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Oct; 64(16):603-4. PubMed ID: 11644057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.