These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39329133)
21. DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding in authenticating processed animal-derived food: A case study involving the Chinese market. Xing RR; Hu RR; Han JX; Deng TT; Chen Y Food Chem; 2020 Mar; 309():125653. PubMed ID: 31670116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Evaluation of Web Page and Label Presentation for Imported Seafood Products Sold on Chinese E-Commerce Platform and Molecular Identification Using DNA Barcoding. Xiong X; Yuan F; Huang M; Cao M; Xiong X J Food Prot; 2020 Feb; 83(2):256-265. PubMed ID: 31961225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. DNA mini-barcoding reveals the mislabeling rate of canned cat food in Taiwan. Wang YC; Liu SH; Ho HC; Su HY; Chang CH PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16833. PubMed ID: 38406290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High level of mislabeling in Spanish and Greek hake markets suggests the fraudulent introduction of African species. Garcia-Vazquez E; Perez J; Martinez JL; Pardiñas AF; Lopez B; Karaiskou N; Casa MF; Machado-Schiaffino G; Triantafyllidis A J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jan; 59(2):475-80. PubMed ID: 21175190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DNA Barcode Identification of Fish Products from Guiyang Markets in Southwestern People's Republic of China. Tang Q; Luo QI; Duan Q; Deng L; Zhang R J Food Prot; 2022 Apr; 85(4):583-590. PubMed ID: 34995351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DNA Barcoding analysis of seafood accuracy in Washington, D.C. restaurants. Stern DB; Castro Nallar E; Rathod J; Crandall KA PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3234. PubMed ID: 28462038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A glimpse into the genetic diversity of the Peruvian seafood sector: Unveiling species substitution, mislabeling and trade of threatened species. Marín A; Serna J; Robles C; Ramírez B; Reyes-Flores LE; Zelada-Mázmela E; Sotil G; Alfaro R PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206596. PubMed ID: 30444869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Integrated DNA barcoding methods to identify species in the processed fish products from Chinese market. Zhao S; Zhang H; Zhao Z; Zhang Y; Yu J; Tang Y; Zhou C Food Res Int; 2024 Apr; 182():114140. PubMed ID: 38519172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prevalence of critically endangered European eel ( Richards JL; Sheng V; Yi CW; Ying CL; Ting NS; Sadovy Y; Baker D Sci Adv; 2020 Mar; 6(10):eaay0317. PubMed ID: 32181342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DNA barcoding reveals mislabeling and commercial fraud in the marketing of fillets of the genus de Carvalho SC; Sampaio I; Santos S Heliyon; 2020 Sep; 6(9):e04888. PubMed ID: 32984598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. DNA barcoding continues to identify endangered species of shark sold as food in a globally significant shark fin trade hub. Selena Shen KL; Cheow JJ; Cheung AB; Koh RJR; Koh Xiao Mun A; Lee YN; Lim YZ; Namatame M; Peng E; Vintenbakh V; Lim EXY; Wainwright BJ PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16647. PubMed ID: 38188178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. DNA barcode markers applied to seafood authentication: an updated review. Fernandes TJR; Amaral JS; Mafra I Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2021; 61(22):3904-3935. PubMed ID: 32838560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genetic assessment of ornamental fish species from North East India. Dhar B; Ghosh SK Gene; 2015 Jan; 555(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 25447914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A case study on DNA barcoding for pet food mislabeling in South Korea. Lee D; Do TD; Baek JW; Mun MH; An HE; Kim CB Ital J Food Saf; 2023 Mar; 12(1):11074. PubMed ID: 37064523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An investigation into country of origin labeling, species authentication and short weighting of commercially sold frozen fish fillets. Peterson AM; McBride GE; Jhita SK; Hellberg RS Heliyon; 2021 Apr; 7(4):e06713. PubMed ID: 33898833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DNA barcoding reveals the mislabeling of fish in a popular tourist destination in Brazil. Staffen CF; Staffen MD; Becker ML; Löfgren SE; Muniz YCN; de Freitas RHA; Marrero AR PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4006. PubMed ID: 29201560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. DNA barcode identification of commercial fish sold in Mexican markets. Sarmiento-Camacho S; Valdez-Moreno M Genome; 2018 Jun; 61(6):457-466. PubMed ID: 29687751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection and identification of marine fish mislabeling in Guangzhou's supermarkets and sushi restaurants using DNA barcoding. Liu B; Yang JW; Liu BS; Zhang N; Guo L; Guo HY; Zhang DC J Food Sci; 2022 Jun; 87(6):2440-2449. PubMed ID: 35438192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Universal mini COI barcode for the identification of fish species in processed products. Sultana S; Ali ME; Hossain MAM; Asing ; Naquiah N; Zaidul ISM Food Res Int; 2018 Mar; 105():19-28. PubMed ID: 29433207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Population dynamics of threadfin porgy Evynnis cardinalis, an endangered species on the IUCN red list in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea. Zhang K; Cai Y; Liao B; Jiang Y; Sun M; Su L; Chen Z J Fish Biol; 2020 Aug; 97(2):479-489. PubMed ID: 32419217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]