These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 393304)
1. Frontal electromyographic feedback. Stress attenuation and generalization. McGowan WT; Haynes SN; Wilson CC Biofeedback Self Regul; 1979 Dec; 4(4):323-36. PubMed ID: 393304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of multiple-site EMG biofeedback in the reduction of arousal. Shirley MC; Burish TG; Rowe C Biofeedback Self Regul; 1982 Jun; 7(2):167-84. PubMed ID: 6753951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Heart rate and finger pulse amplitude during muscular relaxation with frontalis versus forearm EMG feedback. Sagberg F Biol Psychol; 1979 Nov; 9(3):201-14. PubMed ID: 397838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Locus of control and frontal electromyographic response training. Carlson JG Biofeedback Self Regul; 1977 Sep; 2(3):259-71. PubMed ID: 922060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ocular and stabilization feedback: an evaluation of two EMG biofeedback control procedures. Hodes RL; Howland EW Biofeedback Self Regul; 1986 Sep; 11(3):207-20. PubMed ID: 3607088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An experiment to test generalization of feedback from frontalis EMG. Le Boeuf A Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 7367177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations in digital temperature during frontal EMG biofeedback training in normal subjects. Montgomery GT Biofeedback Self Regul; 1988 Jun; 13(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 3061474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feedback delays and relaxation expectancies in EMG biofeedback. Monsma BR; Glaros AG; Lumley MA Biofeedback Self Regul; 1988 Jun; 13(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 3061472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of EMG biofeedback and a credible pseudotherapy in treating tension headache. Holroyd KA; Andrasik F; Noble J J Behav Med; 1980 Mar; 3(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 6995615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using biofeedback to reduce left arm extensor EMG of string players during musical performance. Morasky RL; Reynolds C; Clarke G Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Dec; 6(4):565-72. PubMed ID: 7326276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biofeedback modification of frontal EMG in normal subjects. Ohno Y; Tanaka Y; Takeya T; Matsubara H; Kuriya N; Komemushi S Biofeedback Self Regul; 1978 Mar; 3(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 667192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of alternative control procedures for electromyographic biofeedback relaxation training. Kiffer JJ; Fridlund AJ; Fowler SC Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Jun; 6(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 7020778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single- and successive-site EMG training in responding to anticipated pain. Diaz CC; Carlson JG J Behav Med; 1984 Jun; 7(2):231-46. PubMed ID: 6748071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of frontalis EMG feedback and reinforcement on frontalis EMG level. Siddle DA; Wood L Biol Psychol; 1979 Nov; 9(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 546459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of frontalis feedback training in producing general body relaxation. Jones GE; Evans PA Biol Psychol; 1981 Jun; 12(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 7041997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generalization of lowered EMG levels during musical performance following biofeedback training. Morasky RL; Reynolds C; Sowell LE Biofeedback Self Regul; 1983 Jun; 8(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 6639976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservative treatment of mandibular dysfunction. Clinical, experimental and electromyographic studies of biofeedback and occlusal appliances. Dahlström L Swed Dent J Suppl; 1984; 24():1-45. PubMed ID: 6395416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]