These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39336097)

  • 1. Agricultural and Ecological Resources Safeguarded by the Prevention of Wild Pig Population Expansion.
    Jareb C; Pepin KM; Miller RS; Sykora S; Shwiff SA; McKee SC
    Biology (Basel); 2024 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 39336097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study.
    Smith AL; Strickland BK; Leopold BD; Cummins JL; Mayer JJ; Street GM
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117742. PubMed ID: 37001426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States.
    Grady MJ; Harper EE; Carlisle KM; Ernst KH; Shwiff SA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 May; 237():488-494. PubMed ID: 30825781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in wild pig (Sus scrofa) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts.
    Treichler JW; VerCauteren KC; Taylor CR; Beasley JC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Dec; 79(12):4765-4773. PubMed ID: 37462084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixed ancestry from wild and domestic lineages contributes to the rapid expansion of invasive feral swine.
    Smyser TJ; Tabak MA; Slootmaker C; Robeson MS; Miller RS; Bosse M; Megens HJ; Groenen MAM; Paiva SR; de Faria DA; Blackburn HD; Schmit BS; Piaggio AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Mar; 29(6):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 32080922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States.
    McClure ML; Burdett CL; Farnsworth ML; Lutman MW; Theobald DM; Riggs PD; Grear DA; Miller RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133771. PubMed ID: 26267266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors and costs associated with removal of a newly established population of invasive wild pigs in Northern U.S.
    Fischer JW; Snow NP; Wilson BE; Beckerman SF; Jacques CN; VanNatta EH; Kay SL; VerCauteren KC
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11528. PubMed ID: 32661318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas.
    McLean HE; Teel TL; Bright AD; Jaebker LM; Tomecek JM; Frank MG; Connally RL; Shwiff SA; Carlisle KM
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112143. PubMed ID: 33631484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the interface between European wild boar (Sus scrofa) and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) in Sweden through a questionnaire study.
    Ernholm L; Ståhl K; Neimanis A; Widgren S; Sternberg-Lewerin S
    Acta Vet Scand; 2023 Sep; 65(1):40. PubMed ID: 37737177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of high-risk contact areas between feral pigs and outdoor-raised pig operations in California: Implications for disease transmission in the wildlife-livestock interface.
    Patterson L; Belkhiria J; Martínez-López B; Pires AFA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270500. PubMed ID: 35763526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pseudorabies Virus and Brucella abortus from an Expanding Wild Pig ( Sus scrofa ) Population in Southern Oklahoma, USA.
    Gaskamp JA; Gee KL; Campbell TA; Silvy NJ; Webb SL
    J Wildl Dis; 2016 Apr; 52(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 27124329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing feral swine movement across the contiguous United States using neural networks and genetic data.
    Giglio RM; Bowden CF; Brook RK; Piaggio AJ; Smyser TJ
    Mol Ecol; 2024 Sep; 33(17):e17489. PubMed ID: 39148259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unregulated Online Sales are High-Risk Sources of Domestic Swine (Sus scrofa) in Canada: Implications for Invasive Wild Pig and AfricanSwine Fever Risk Preparedness.
    MacDonald AM; Brook RK
    J Wildl Dis; 2023 Jul; 59(3):509-514. PubMed ID: 37170424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.
    TuckerWilliams E; Lepczyk CA; Morse W; Smith M
    Environ Manage; 2024 May; 73(5):1032-1048. PubMed ID: 38466407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-level movement response of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) to removal.
    Bastille-Rousseau G; Schlichting PE; Keiter DA; Smith JB; Kilgo JC; Wittemyer G; Vercauteren KC; Beasley JC; Pepin KM
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Jan; 77(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 32738020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seroprevalence of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus in Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) in 17 States in the USA.
    Kennedy SM; Passler T; Ditchkoff SS; Brown VR; Raithel GW; Chamorro MF; Walz PH; Kyriakis CS; Falkenberg SM
    J Wildl Dis; 2024 Jul; 60(3):647-659. PubMed ID: 38752344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distribution and prevalence of antibodies to Trichinella spp. and Toxoplasma gondii in wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States.
    Cleveland CA; Haynes E; Callaghan KC; Fojtik A; Coker S; Doub E; Brown VR; Majewska AA; Yabsley MJ
    Vet Parasitol; 2024 Jan; 325():110090. PubMed ID: 38043480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Cost-Effective Methods for Rapid and Repeatable National Scale Detection and Mapping of Invasive Species Spread.
    Aschim RA; Brook RK
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7254. PubMed ID: 31076638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of Brucella suis, Campylobacter jejuni, and Escherichia coli Strains in Feral Pig (Sus scrofa) Communities of Georgia.
    Lama JK; Bachoon DS
    Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis; 2018 Jul; 18(7):350-355. PubMed ID: 29698123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and risks from a modified sodium nitrite toxic bait for wild pigs.
    Snow NP; Wishart JD; Foster JA; Staples LD; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Apr; 77(4):1616-1625. PubMed ID: 33200879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.