These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39337663)

  • 1. Exploring Taxonomic and Genetic Relationships in the
    Sikora J; Celiński K
    Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Sep; 25(18):. PubMed ID: 39337663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speciation history of three closely related pines Pinus mugo (T.), P. uliginosa (N.) and P. sylvestris (L.).
    Wachowiak W; Palmé AE; Savolainen O
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Apr; 20(8):1729-43. PubMed ID: 21375633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New Insight into Taxonomy of European Mountain Pines,
    Sokołowska J; Fuchs H; Celiński K
    Plants (Basel); 2021 Jun; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34209970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different patterns of genetic structure of relict and isolated populations of endangered peat-bog pine (Pinus uliginosa Neumann).
    Wachowiak W; Prus-Glowacki W
    J Appl Genet; 2009; 50(4):329-39. PubMed ID: 19875883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volatiles as Chemosystematic Markers for Distinguishing Closely Related Species within the Pinus mugo Complex.
    Celiński K; Bonikowski R; Wojnicka-Półtorak A; Chudzińska E; Maliński T
    Chem Biodivers; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1208-13. PubMed ID: 26265572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seed Total Protein Profiling in Discrimination of Closely Related Pines: Evidence from the
    Celiński K; Sokołowska J; Zemleduch-Barylska A; Kuna R; Kijak H; Staszak AM; Wojnicka-Półtorak A; Chudzińska E
    Plants (Basel); 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32660038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patterns of
    Łabiszak B; Zaborowska J; Wachowiak W
    AoB Plants; 2019 Apr; 11(2):plz015. PubMed ID: 30972216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative transcriptomics of a complex of four European pine species.
    Wachowiak W; Trivedi U; Perry A; Cavers S
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):234. PubMed ID: 25887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reciprocal controlled crosses between Pinus sylvestris and P. mugo verified by a species-specific cpDNA marker.
    Wachowiak W; Lewandowski A; Prus-Głowacki W
    J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15741663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous hybridization between Pinus mugo and Pinus sylvestris at the Lithuanian seaside: a morphological survey.
    Danusevičius D; Marozas V; Brazaitis G; Petrokas R; Christensen KI
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():172407. PubMed ID: 22619615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic, morphological, geographical and ecological approaches reveal phylogenetic relationships in complex groups, an example of recently diverged pinyon pine species (Subsection Cembroides).
    Flores-Rentería L; Wegier A; Ortega Del Vecchyo D; Ortíz-Medrano A; Piñero D; Whipple AV; Molina-Freaner F; Domínguez CA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Dec; 69(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 23831459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes.
    Parks M; Cronn R; Liston A
    BMC Biol; 2009 Dec; 7():84. PubMed ID: 19954512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstructing the plant mitochondrial genome for marker discovery: a case study using Pinus.
    Donnelly K; Cottrell J; Ennos RA; Vendramin GG; A'Hara S; King S; Perry A; Wachowiak W; Cavers S
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):943-954. PubMed ID: 27997742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of the DNA barcoding approach for closely related conifers discrimination: A case study of the Pinus mugo complex.
    Celiński K; Kijak H; Wojnicka-Półtorak A; Buczkowska-Chmielewska K; Sokołowska J; Chudzińska E
    C R Biol; 2017; 340(6-7):339-348. PubMed ID: 28711357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Candidate Genes for the High-Altitude Adaptations of Two Mountain Pine Taxa.
    Zaborowska J; Łabiszak B; Perry A; Cavers S; Wachowiak W
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 33801727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular signatures of divergence and selection in closely related pine taxa.
    Wachowiak W; Zaborowska J; Łabiszak B; Perry A; Zucca GM; González-Martínez SC; Cavers S
    Tree Genet Genomes; 2018; 14(6):83. PubMed ID: 30930708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pinus ponderosa: A checkered past obscured four species.
    Willyard A; Gernandt DS; Potter K; Hipkins V; Marquardt P; Mahalovich MF; Langer SK; Telewski FW; Cooper B; Douglas C; Finch K; Karemera HH; Lefler J; Lea P; Wofford A
    Am J Bot; 2017 Jan; 104(1):161-181. PubMed ID: 28031167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic relationships and species delimitation in pinus section trifoliae inferrred from plastid DNA.
    Hernández-León S; Gernandt DS; Pérez de la Rosa JA; Jardón-Barbolla L
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e70501. PubMed ID: 23936218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early phenology and growth trait variation in closely related European pine species.
    Wachowiak W; Perry A; Donnelly K; Cavers S
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Jan; 8(1):655-666. PubMed ID: 29321902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finding a (pine) needle in a haystack: chloroplast genome sequence divergence in rare and widespread pines.
    Whittall JB; Syring J; Parks M; Buenrostro J; Dick C; Liston A; Cronn R
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Mar; 19 Suppl 1():100-14. PubMed ID: 20331774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.