BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3934064)

  • 1. The impact of autopsy data on DRG reimbursement.
    Guariglia P; Abrahams C
    Hum Pathol; 1985 Dec; 16(12):1184-6. PubMed ID: 3934064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autopsy diagnoses can increase DRG reimbursement.
    Holmes J; Baer DM
    Pathologist; 1986 Sep; 40(9):36-9. PubMed ID: 10311733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DRG dumping?
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(6):5. PubMed ID: 10311029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Majority of hospitals consider DRG 104 to be a moneymaker.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):84. PubMed ID: 10317679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DRGs, incentives, hospitals, and physicians.
    Berki SE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1985; 4(4):70-6. PubMed ID: 3938445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capital costs, calculation of prices principal issues in DRG legislation.
    Lefton D
    Am Med News; 1983 Apr; 26(13):1, 15, 22. PubMed ID: 10310031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tough HCFA, PRO scrutiny may hit hospitals with many DRG 88 cases.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):85-6. PubMed ID: 10311417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospitals ponder effect, fate of DRG plan.
    Am Med News; 1983 Feb; 26(6):27-8. PubMed ID: 10309835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Senator: planned DRG freeze could thaw.
    HPN Hosp Purch News; 1985 Apr; 9(4):1, 23-4. PubMed ID: 10325093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do diagnosis-related groups accurately reflect the disease? Pancreatic pseudocyst: a case in point.
    Ephgrave K; Hunt J
    Arch Surg; 1985 Jun; 120(6):703-7. PubMed ID: 3924006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DHHS + DRG = prospective reimbursement.
    Weller A
    Pathologist; 1982 Dec; 36(12):646-7. PubMed ID: 10310094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should children's hospitals have special consideration in reimbursement policy?
    Long MJ; Dreachslin JL; Fisher J
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 10311778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IPPS FY'07 final rule contains 3-year phase-in for DRG cost weights, 3.4 percent payment increase.
    Hosp Outlook; 2006; 9(3):1, 12. PubMed ID: 17128553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculating DRG-based Medicare payment rates.
    Grimaldi PL
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Oct; 64(10):72-5, 80, 82. PubMed ID: 10310271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reality of the DRG system.
    O'Brien CM
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1984 Jun; 63(6):255-61. PubMed ID: 6430672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An overview of DRG regulations--the impact of changing reimbursement patterns.
    Morgan LB; Kappel CA
    Top Health Care Financ; 1985; 11(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 3920783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives. Prospective payment: DRG era dawns.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Sep; 37(35):4p. PubMed ID: 10310221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legislative currents: an approach to prospective payment to hospitals.
    Cofer J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Mar; 54(3):11-3. PubMed ID: 10309867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caution, support in testimony on DRG prospective pay plan.
    Lefton D
    Am Med News; 1983 Mar; 26(9):2, 8. PubMed ID: 10310033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A positive first step: prospective payment by DRG.
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):12-4, 18-22. PubMed ID: 10315273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.