These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39342266)
1. Preclinical and clinical evidence for using perinatal tissue allografts in nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy to hasten recovery of functional outcomes: a literature review. Perry AG; Kahn A; Mercuri J; Rini K; Chang J; Pathak RA BMC Urol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):208. PubMed ID: 39342266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can nerve monitoring during radical prostatectomy improve functional outcomes? A randomised trial. Nolsøe AB; Østergren PB; Jakobsen H; Jensen CFS; Bruun NH; Sønksen J; Fode M BJU Int; 2024 Jun; 133(6):742-751. PubMed ID: 38348547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies]. Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide. Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft Nerve Wrap Around the Prostatic Neurovascular Bundle Accelerates Early Return to Continence and Potency Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Patel VR; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Kumar A; Coelho R; Rocco B; Palmer K Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):977-980. PubMed ID: 25613153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients. Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Igloo' technique for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - maximum nerve sparing for early recovery of continence and sexual function. Fankhauser CD; Malkmus C; Aschwanden F; Baumeister P; Mattei A BJU Int; 2024 Aug; 134(2):307-311. PubMed ID: 38664227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center. Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of continence and potency after radical prostatectomy: Robotic vs. laparoscopic approaches, validating LAP-01 trial. López-Abad A; Server Gómez G; Loyola Maturana JP; Giménez Andreu I; Collado Serra A; Wong Gutiérrez A; Boronat Catalá J; de Pablos Rodríguez P; Gómez-Ferrer Á; Casanova Ramón-Borja J; Ramírez Backhaus M Surg Oncol; 2024 Aug; 55():102098. PubMed ID: 38991627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with membranous urethra and neurovascular bundle preservation. Ando S; Sugihara T; Hinotsu S; Kishino H; Hirata D; Watanabe R; Yanase A; Yokoyama H; Hoshina H; Endo K; Kamei J; Takaoka E; Fujimura T Int J Urol; 2024 May; 31(5):492-499. PubMed ID: 38196247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence. Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Xiang P; Du Z; Guan D; Yan W; Wang M; Guo D; Liu D; Liu Y; Ping H World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 22(1):66. PubMed ID: 38395861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Yao A; Hinata N; Fujisawa M J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26994775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]