These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39345947)
1. Electrically evoked late latency response using single electrode stimulation and its relation to speech perception among paediatric cochlear implant users. Saravanan P; Devi N; Geetha C Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1441854. PubMed ID: 39345947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception. Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users. Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users. Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users. Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gap detection measured with electrically evoked auditory event-related potentials and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Woodard J; Park LR; Hatch DR; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):733-44. PubMed ID: 23722354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users. van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users. Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures. Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e63-74. PubMed ID: 24231629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of the P1 Latency in Auditory and Speech Performance Evaluation in Cochlear Implanted Children. Xiong S; Jiang L; Wang Y; Pan T; Ma F Neural Plast; 2022; 2022():6894794. PubMed ID: 35422857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users. Kranick M; Wagner L; Plontke S; Rahne T Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 May; 22(3):121-127. PubMed ID: 33297872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users. Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users. Brown CJ; Etler C; He S; O'Brien S; Erenberg S; Kim JR; Dhuldhoya AN; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):704-17. PubMed ID: 18596644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in Digisonic cochlear implant users. Maurer J; Collet L; Pelster H; Truy E; Gallégo S Laryngoscope; 2002 Dec; 112(12):2220-4. PubMed ID: 12461344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cortical reorganization after cochlear implantation for adults with single-sided deafness. Legris E; Galvin J; Roux S; Gomot M; Aoustin JM; Marx M; He S; Bakhos D PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204402. PubMed ID: 30248131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience. Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users. Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 37026816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]