These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39346783)

  • 1. Kids are not just small adults: An attempt to validate pediatric tablet-based digits in noise testing.
    Dunlap A; McBride M; Tuominen A; Roby B; Redmann A; Meyer A; Herd H; Meyer C; Chinnadurai S; Finch M; Jayawardena ADL
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2024 Oct; 9(5):e70001. PubMed ID: 39346783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1037-1048. PubMed ID: 34799493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
    De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech Recognition in Noise Using Binaural Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise in Children: Maturation and Self-Test Validity.
    Wolmarans J; De Sousa KC; Frisby C; Mahomed-Asmail F; Smits C; Moore DR; Swanepoel W
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 May; 32(5):315-323. PubMed ID: 34375996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of the antiphasic digits-in-noise test to simulated unilateral and bilateral conductive hearing loss.
    Polspoel S; Moore DR; Swanepoel W; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Nov; 62(11):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 36121040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. French Version of the Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise Test for Smartphone Hearing Screening.
    Ceccato JC; Duran MJ; Swanepoel W; Smits C; De Sousa KC; Gledhill L; Venail F; Puel JL
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():725080. PubMed ID: 34722438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds.
    Motlagh Zadeh L; Brennan V; Swanepoel W; Lin L; Moore DR
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Aug; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 39109478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds.
    Zadeh LM; Brennan V; Swanepoel W; Lin L; Moore DR
    medRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35821983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
    Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a Computer-Administered Version of the Digits-in-Noise Test for Hearing Screening in the United States.
    Folmer RL; Vachhani J; McMillan GP; Watson C; Kidd GR; Feeney MP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28240983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise.
    Koopmans WJA; Goverts ST; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29554035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digits in noise testing in a multilingual sample of Asian adults.
    Chee J; Eikelboom RH; Smits C; Swanepoel W; Wee SL; Ng TP; Heywood RL
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):269-274. PubMed ID: 36847757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tablet-based Screening for Hearing Loss: Feasibility of Testing in Nonspecialty Locations.
    Kelly EA; Stadler ME; Nelson S; Runge CL; Friedland DR
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):410-416. PubMed ID: 29494473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural temporal coding and the middle ear muscle reflex in audiometrically normal young adults.
    Shehabi AM; Prendergast G; Guest H; Plack CJ
    Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108663. PubMed ID: 36502543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the Efficiency of the Digits-in-Noise Hearing Screening Test: A Comparison Between Four Different Test Procedures.
    Dambha T; Swanepoel W; Mahomed-Asmail F; De Sousa KC; Graham MA; Smits C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):378-391. PubMed ID: 34890245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digits-in-noise test in Brazilian Portuguese: how demographic and socioeconomic variables influence normal-hearing subjects.
    Barros VV; Nunes-Araújo ADDS; Silva ARXD; Cavalcanti HG; Ferrari DV; Balen SA
    Codas; 2022; 34(6):e20210274. PubMed ID: 35544883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Establishment of the characterization of an adult digits-in-noise test based on internet].
    Qi BE; Zhang TB; Fu XX; Li GP
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 32(3):202-205. PubMed ID: 29775022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.
    Smits C; Watson CS; Kidd GR; Moore DR; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.