These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39350253)

  • 1. Views of research ethics committee members on end-of-participation communications for trial participants who stop taking part: a cross-sectional survey study.
    Cragg WJ; Bishop L; Gilberts R; Gregg M; Mancini M; de Barros CM
    Trials; 2024 Sep; 25(1):636. PubMed ID: 39350253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How can we support research participants who stop taking part? Communications guidance developed through public-researcher collaboration.
    Cragg WJ; Bishop L; Gilberts R; Gregg M; Lowdon T; Mancini M; Martins de Barros C; Wheatstone P
    Res Involv Engagem; 2024 Apr; 10(1):39. PubMed ID: 38637845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent in Sri Lanka: a survey among ethics committee members.
    Sumathipala A; Siribaddana S; Hewage S; Lekamwattage M; Athukorale M; Siriwardhana C; Murray J; Prince M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2008 May; 9():10. PubMed ID: 18489793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in UK surgical trials: a survey and focus groups with stakeholders to identify practices, views, and experiences.
    Crocker JC; Pratt-Boyden K; Hislop J; Rees S; Locock L; Olszowski S; Chant A; Treweek S; Cook JA; Woolfall K; Farrar N; Bostock J; Bulbulia R
    Trials; 2019 Feb; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 30744684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam.
    Van Nuil JI; Nguyen TTT; Le Nguyen TN; Nguyen VVC; Chambers M; Ta TDN; Merson L; Nguyen TPD; Hoang MTV; Parker M; Bull S; Kestelyn E
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 31924199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers.
    Shearman K; Masters A; Nutt D; Bowman S; Draper H
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e055208. PubMed ID: 35715186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members.
    Hokke S; Hackworth NJ; Bennetts SK; Nicholson JM; Keyzer P; Lucke J; Zion L; Crawford SB
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020; 15(1-2):12-27. PubMed ID: 31195884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical issues of informed consent in malaria research proposals submitted to a research ethics committee in Thailand: a retrospective document review.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limpattaracharoen C; Suebtrakul S; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Wilairatana P; Adams P; Kaewkungwal J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28807022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.
    Kent G
    J Med Ethics; 1997 Jun; 23(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 9220334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ESHG-ESHRE survey on the current practice of expanded carrier screening in medically assisted reproduction.
    Capalbo A; de Wert G; Henneman L; Kakourou G; Mcheik S; Peterlin B; van El C; Vassena R; Vermeulen N; Viville S; Forzano F
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Aug; 39(8):1844-1855. PubMed ID: 38872341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the functions and operations of data monitoring committees: Survey and focus group findings.
    Calis KA; Archdeacon P; Bain RP; Forrest A; Perlmutter J; DeMets DL
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 27885056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A survey in Mexico about ethics dumping in clinical research.
    Germán NH; Rosemarie B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):38. PubMed ID: 31159787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of risks and benefits communication strategies by research nurses.
    Nusbaum L; Douglas B; Estrella-Luna N; Paasche-Orlow M; Damus K
    Nurs Ethics; 2019 May; 26(3):937-950. PubMed ID: 29103367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness and acceptability of multimedia information when recruiting children and young people to trials: the TRECA meta-analysis of SWATs.
    Knapp P; Martin-Kerry J; Moe-Byrne T; Sheridan R; Coleman E; Roche J; Young B; Higgins S; Preston J; Bower P; Gamble C; Stones C
    Health Soc Care Deliv Res; 2023 Nov; 11(24):1-112. PubMed ID: 38140894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicating with participants during the conduct of multi-center clinical trials.
    Augustine EF; Dorsey ER; Hauser RA; Elm JJ; Tilley BC; Kieburtz KK
    Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):592-596. PubMed ID: 27573636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public perception of participation in low-risk clinical trials in critical care using waived consent: a Canadian national survey.
    Opgenorth D; Duquette DJ; Tyre L; Auld R; Crowder K; Gilchrist P; Young PJ; Bagshaw SM
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jul; 71(7):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 38459367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.