These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3936126)

  • 1. New protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Dutreix A; Mijnheer B; Svensson H
    Radiother Oncol; 1985 Dec; 4(4):289-90. PubMed ID: 3936126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The new NACP- and ICRU-dosimetry protocols for dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron radiation.
    Svensson H
    Radiother Oncol; 1985 Dec; 4(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 3936127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Summary of the discussion on the practical use and comparison of new protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1985 Dec; 4(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 4081123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Mattsson O
    Radiother Oncol; 1985 Dec; 4(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 4081121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of electron contamination on in vivo surface dosimetry for high-energy photon beams.
    Sjögren R; Karlsson M
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 9650182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators.
    Cardenas CE; Nitsch PL; Kudchadker RJ; Howell RM; Kry SF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 27455499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of oblique electron beams to the surface dose under the bolus.
    Demir B; Okutan M; Cakir A; Göksel E; Bilge H
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 19854390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the effective point of measurement in megavoltage photon beams.
    Kawrakow I
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 16872090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurements of output factors with different detector types and Monte Carlo calculations of stopping-power ratios for degraded electron beams.
    Björk P; Knöös T; Nilsson P
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(19):4493-506. PubMed ID: 15552413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angular distributions of absorbed dose of Bremsstrahlung and secondary electrons induced by 18-, 28- and 38-MeV electron beams in thick targets.
    Takada M; Kosako K; Oishi K; Nakamura T; Sato K; Kamiyama T; Kiyanagi Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Mar; 153(3):369-83. PubMed ID: 22761326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs.
    Chibani O; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ion recombination correction for very high dose-per-pulse high-energy electron beams.
    Di Martino F; Giannelli M; Traino AC; Lazzeri M
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2204-10. PubMed ID: 16121574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct determination of k
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(3):035041. PubMed ID: 29327693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.