These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3936800)

  • 1. The shape of the mandible.
    Lavelle CL; Greenwood R
    Int J Oral Surg; 1985 Dec; 14(6):517-25. PubMed ID: 3936800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of mandibular shape.
    Lavelle CL
    Br J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 11(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 6587909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Architectural characteristics of the normal and deformity mandible revealed by three-dimensional functional unit analysis.
    Park W; Kim BC; Yu HS; Yi CK; Lee SH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 19823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional prediction of mandibular movement in the treatment of prognathism.
    Ueda K; Kobayashi M; Nakajima T; Sasakura H; Hanada K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Jan; 44(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 3455721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular position in class III malocclusion.
    Kerr WJ; TenHave TR
    Br J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 15(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 3203099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of mandibular rami width in patients with prognathism and retrognathia.
    Ribeiro DP; Gandelmann IH; Medeiros PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1506-9. PubMed ID: 16982309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Hillerup S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 55(10):1071-9; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 9331229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Kobayashi T; Ueda K; Honma K; Sasakura H; Hanada K; Nakajima T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1990 Feb; 18(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 2312741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Ueki K; Okabe K; Mukozawa A; Miyazaki M; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 19699116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric evaluation of skeletal mandibular prognathism.
    Fischer-Brandies H
    Int J Orthod; 1985; 23(3-4):4-8. PubMed ID: 3866753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spline analysis of the mandible in human subjects with class III malocclusion.
    Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
    Arch Oral Biol; 1997 May; 42(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 9233843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cephalometric study of the morphological character of the mandible in the true mandibular protrusion group].
    Kiyama K; Himeno R; Ito A; Nakasima M; Matsumoto M
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Sep; 43(3):396-412. PubMed ID: 6596340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of 2D:4D in subjects with anteroposterior mandibular dysplasia.
    Premkumar S; Gurumurthy B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):582-5. PubMed ID: 24309331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of skeletal stability following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Ayoub AF; Millett DT; Hasan S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Aug; 38(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 10922156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of mandibular ramus morphology using computed tomography in patients with mandibular prognathism and retrognathia: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Noleto JW; Marchiori E; Da Silveira HM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1788-94. PubMed ID: 20493618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in the dimensions of milled mandibular models after mandibular sagittal split osteotomies.
    Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jun; 36(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 9678885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
    Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery.
    Hwang SJ; Haers PE; Zimmermann A; Oechslin C; Seifert B; Sailer HF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 May; 89(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 10807709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.