These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39369332)
1. Comparison of stepping-based metrics from ActiGraph accelerometers worn concurrently on the non-dominant wrist and waist among young adults. Buchan DS J Sports Sci; 2024 Sep; 42(17):1664-1672. PubMed ID: 39369332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stepping up with GGIR: Validity of step cadence derived from wrist-worn research-grade accelerometers using the verisense step count algorithm. Rowlands AV; Maylor B; Dawkins NP; Dempsey PC; Edwardson CL; Soczawa-Stronczyk AA; Bocian M; Patterson MR; Yates T J Sports Sci; 2022 Oct; 40(19):2182-2190. PubMed ID: 36384415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stepping towards More Intuitive Physical Activity Metrics with Wrist-Worn Accelerometry: Validity of an Open-Source Step-Count Algorithm. Maylor BD; Edwardson CL; Dempsey PC; Patterson MR; Plekhanova T; Yates T; Rowlands AV Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of physical activity from Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers worn on the dominant and non-dominant wrist. Buchan DS; McSeveney F; McLellan G Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2019 Jan; 39(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 30058765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Mobile Applications Valid for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Students? Wearfit Study. Viciana J; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Mayorga-Vega D J Sports Sci Med; 2022 Sep; 21(3):356-375. PubMed ID: 36157395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting. Bai Y; Tompkins C; Gell N; Dione D; Zhang T; Byun W PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251975. PubMed ID: 34038458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement of Step-Based Metrics From ActiGraph and ActivPAL Accelerometers Worn Concurrently Among Older Adults. Hyde ET; Nguyen S; Tuz-Zahra F; Moore CC; Greenwood-Hickman MA; Walker RL; Natarajan L; Rosenberg D; Bellettiere J J Meas Phys Behav; 2022 Dec; 5(4):242-251. PubMed ID: 36816711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X. Mikkelsen MK; Berg-Beckhoff G; Frederiksen P; Horgan G; O'Driscoll R; Palmeira AL; Scott SE; Stubbs J; Heitmann BL; Larsen SC PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study. Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of a Novel Research-Grade Physical Activity and Sleep Monitor for Continuous Remote Patient Monitoring. McDevitt B; Moore L; Akhtar N; Connolly J; Doherty R; Scott W Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33805690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments. Nakagata T; Murakami H; Kawakami R; Tripette J; Nakae S; Yamada Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tanaka S; Miyachi M Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():24-33. PubMed ID: 36030707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites. Tudor-Locke C; Barreira TV; Schuna JM Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):839-42. PubMed ID: 25121517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort. Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study. Müller AM; Wang NX; Yao J; Tan CS; Low ICC; Lim N; Tan J; Tan A; Müller-Riemenschneider F JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14120. PubMed ID: 31579026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions. Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study. Mora-Gonzalez J; Gould ZR; Moore CC; Aguiar EJ; Ducharme SW; Schuna JM; Barreira TV; Staudenmayer J; McAvoy CR; Boikova M; Miller TA; Tudor-Locke C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Sep; 19(1):117. PubMed ID: 36076265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]