These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39369731)
1. Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 Assay using fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Ng DL; Vuhahula E; Kimambo AH; Ndayisaba MC; Philipo GS; Mushi BP; Ho KE; Paciorek A; Illonga Z; Zhang L; Vohra P; Weidler J; Bates M; Mmbaga EJ; Van Loon K Lancet Oncol; 2024 Nov; 25(11):1440-1452. PubMed ID: 39369731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT 4 Assay on the GeneXpert instrument to Assess Hormone Receptor, Ki67, and HER2 Gene Expression Status in Breast Cancer Tissue Samples. Sewanywa L; Hale M; Michelow P; Mayne E; Wiggill T Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Oct; 31(9):613-620. PubMed ID: 37800656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating Estrogen Receptor Immunohistochemistry on Cell Blocks From Breast Cancer Patients in a Low-Resource Setting. Kimambo AH; Vuhahula EA; Mwakigonja AR; Ljung BM; Zhang L; Van Loon K; Ng DL Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 33053150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform. Wu NC; Wong W; Ho KE; Chu VC; Rizo A; Davenport S; Kelly D; Makar R; Jassem J; Duchnowska R; Biernat W; Radecka B; Fujita T; Klein JL; Stonecypher M; Ohta S; Juhl H; Weidler JM; Bates M; Press MF Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(2):327-338. PubMed ID: 30120700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of breast cancer surrogate subtyping using a closed-system RT-qPCR breast cancer assay and immunohistochemistry on 100 core needle biopsies with matching surgical specimens. Janeva S; Parris TZ; Nasic S; De Lara S; Larsson K; Audisio RA; Olofsson Bagge R; Kovács A BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):439. PubMed ID: 33879115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are fine-needle aspiration biopsy-derived cell blocks a useful surrogate for tissue samples in breast cancer? Puccetti M; Ravaioli S; Tumedei MM; Bucchi E; Malmesi M; Medri L; Bravaccini S Histopathology; 2018 Nov; 73(5):801-808. PubMed ID: 29944734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNA expression in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: results from ABCSG Trial 6. Filipits M; Rudas M; Singer CF; Fitzal F; Bago-Horvath Z; Greil R; Balic M; Lax SF; Halper S; Hulla W; Wu NC; Liu X; Weidler J; Bates M; Hlauschek D; Gnant M; Dubsky P ESMO Open; 2021 Aug; 6(4):100228. PubMed ID: 34371382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 for Biomarker Evaluation in Tissue Processed in a Developing Country. Mugabe M; Ho KE; Ruhangaza D; Milner D; Rugwizangoga B; Chu VC; Wu NC; Rizo A; Weidler JM; Wong W; Bates M; Brock JE Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Oct; 156(5):766-776. PubMed ID: 34050358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Diagnosing Breast Cancer. Paul P; Azad S; Agrawal S; Rao S; Chowdhury N Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 36412573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Immediate Triage in Breast Cancer Screening in Tanzania. Philipo GS; Vuhahula E; Kimambo A; Mmbaga EJ; Van Loon K; Ng DL JCO Glob Oncol; 2021 Jan; 7():146-152. PubMed ID: 33493018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of quantitative shear wave elastography combined with conventional ultrasound in evaluating and guiding fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph node for early breast cancer: implication for axillary surgical stage. Liu X; Huang YN; Wu YL; Zhu XY; Xie ZM; Li J BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Aug; 24(1):229. PubMed ID: 39215218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Macrodissection prior to closed system RT-qPCR is not necessary for estrogen receptor and HER2 concordance with IHC/FISH in breast cancer. Gupta S; Mani NR; Carvajal-Hausdorf DE; Bossuyt V; Ho K; Weidler J; Wong W; Rhees B; Bates M; Rimm DL Lab Invest; 2018 Aug; 98(8):1076-1083. PubMed ID: 29858579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast fine needle aspiration continues to be relevant in a large academic medical center: experience from Massachusetts General Hospital. Dong J; Ly A; Arpin R; Ahmed Q; Brachtel E Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 27383478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of immunocytochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on fine-needle aspiration cytology samples of breast cancers: A comparative study. Acs B; Szekely N; Szasz AM; Lotz G; Szekely T; Istok R; Szekely E; Madaras L; Kulka J; Jaray B Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 44(6):466-71. PubMed ID: 26990933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy is determined by physician training in sampling technique. Ljung BM; Drejet A; Chiampi N; Jeffrey J; Goodson WH; Chew K; Moore DH; Miller TR Cancer; 2001 Aug; 93(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 11507700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study. Vohra P; Buelow B; Chen YY; Serrano M; Vohra MS; Berry A; Ljung BM Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Nov; 124(11):828-835. PubMed ID: 27315045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]