These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39374422)
1. A Comparative Study of Traditional and Computer-aided Surgical Simulation Guides in Orthognathic Correction of Bimaxillary Protrusion. Yang G; Xie F; Chen F; Li L; Li B; Dong Y; Yang B J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39374422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic analysis of clinical outcomes of anterior maxillary and mandibular subapical osteotomy with preoperative modeling in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. Xie F; Teng L; Jin X; Zheng J; Xu J; Lu J; Zhang C; Xu M; Zeng H; Li S; Sun X J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):1980-6. PubMed ID: 24220386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of soft- and hard-tissue changes following combined anterior segmental bi-jaw orthognathic surgery. Mishra M; Singh G; Gaur A; Mondal S; Singh A; Bharti P Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 37661970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison between computer aided simulation and dental model orthognathic surgery for the treatment of patients with mandibular excess and facial asymmetries]. Shen SY; Chen TT; Lu CP; Jiang TF; Wang XD; Shen GF Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):651-655. PubMed ID: 27806756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Therapeutic evaluation of the correction of the severe bi-maxillary protrusion cases by Tweed-Merrifield technique]. Huang JQ; Liu SY; Jiang JH Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Jun; 48(3):555-61. PubMed ID: 27318924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application of PAR index and cephalometrics for camouflage therapy and orthodontic-orthognathic surgery in adults with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion]. Li XR; Chen B; Li M; DU C; Meng J Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Aug; 32(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 38044738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-Aided Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Study with the Establishment of Burstone Analysis-Derived 3D Norms. Ho CT; Denadai R; Lai HC; Lo LJ; Lin HH J Clin Med; 2019 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 31810228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients. Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided design and computer-aided modeling (CAD/CAM) generated surgical splints, cutting guides and custom-made implants: Which indications in orthognathic surgery? Scolozzi P Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2015 Dec; 116(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 26598243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback. Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Hillerup S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 55(10):1071-9; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 9331229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients]. Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome study of computer-aided surgical simulation in the treatment of patients with craniomaxillofacial deformities. Xia JJ; Shevchenko L; Gateno J; Teichgraeber JF; Taylor TD; Lasky RE; English JD; Kau CH; McGrory KR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):2014-24. PubMed ID: 21684451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance for bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a retrospective study]. Li ZX; Yuan LJ; Zheng XW; Liu L; Liu C; Fang B Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Oct; 32(5):480-484. PubMed ID: 38171516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With Preoperative Modeling and Postoperative Orthodontic in the Treatment of Mandibular Protrusion. Li Y; Sun X; Teng L; Xu J; Lu J; Ding B; Zhang C; Xie F; Sun X J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):2083-2087. PubMed ID: 27536911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical stability of different orthognathic treatments for correcting skeletal anterior open bite: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang M; Zhang B; Li L; Zhai M; Wang Z; Wei F Eur J Orthod; 2022 Jan; 44(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 33822036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided Surgical Planning and Osteosynthesis Plates for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Study of 14 Consecutive Patients. Shakoori P; Yang R; Nah HD; Scott M; Swanson JW; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2022 Nov; 10(11):e4609. PubMed ID: 36415614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of the accuracy between two computer-aided surgical simulation methods in virtual surgical planning. Ferraz FWDS; Iwaki-Filho L; Souza-Pinto GN; Iwaki LCV; Li AT; Cardoso MA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Feb; 49(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 33376041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of bimax and segmental surgeries for correction of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion class I on soft tissue parameters: upper lip thickness and curvature, nasolabial angle and nasal prominence. Rahpeyma A; Khajehahmadi S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 24858756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study. Johnston C; Burden D; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16979487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]