These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39377683)

  • 1. A New Paradigm for Reading Screening Mammograms.
    Grimm LJ
    Radiology; 2024 Oct; 313(1):e242141. PubMed ID: 39377683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AI for reading screening mammograms: the need for circumspection.
    Autier P; Burrion JB; Grivegnée AR
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4783-4784. PubMed ID: 32318845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme: a cost-consequence analysis.
    Posso MC; Puig T; Quintana MJ; Solà-Roca J; Bonfill X
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3262-71. PubMed ID: 26747264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overweight women may require more frequent mammograms.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2018 Mar; 124(6):1099. PubMed ID: 29509326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Cancer Screening and Optimizing Recommendations.
    Lancaster RB; Gulla S; De Los Santos J; Umphrey H
    Semin Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 53(4):280-293. PubMed ID: 30449346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controversy surrounding mammography screening? Not in our opinion.
    Drukteinis JS; Kiluk JV
    Cancer Control; 2014 Apr; 21(2):176-7. PubMed ID: 24667405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer diagnosis by mammography in Kazakhstan - staging results of breast cancer with double reading.
    Beysebayev E; Tulebayev K; Meymanalyev T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 25640371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Developments in Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment.
    Dinardo D; McNeil M
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Apr; 28(4):423-426. PubMed ID: 30969906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Image Quality and Sensitivity in an Organized Mammography Screening Program.
    Théberge I; Guertin MH; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Dufresne MP; Wadden N; Shumak R; Samson C; Langlois A; Larocque I; Perron L; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Feb; 69(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 29458953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for Breast Cancer.
    Niell BL; Freer PE; Weinfurtner RJ; Arleo EK; Drukteinis JS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 Nov; 55(6):1145-1162. PubMed ID: 28991557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2).
    Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():98-101. PubMed ID: 28107735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Models and High-Risk Screening.
    Barke LD; Freivogel ME
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):457-474. PubMed ID: 28411673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence to Support Screening Women Annually.
    Eby PR
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):441-456. PubMed ID: 28411672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: Is independent double reading still required?
    Weigel S; Hense HW; Weyer-Elberich V; Gerss J; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2024 Aug; 196(8):834-842. PubMed ID: 38295824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence to Support Screening Women in Their 40s.
    Ray KM; Price ER; Joe BN
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):429-439. PubMed ID: 28411671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
    Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
    Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient, primary care provider, and stakeholder perspectives on mammography screening frequency: lessons learned from a qualitative study.
    Ro V; Jones T; Silverman T; McGuinness JE; Guzman A; Amenta J; Kukafka R; Crew KD
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(1):819. PubMed ID: 35897000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.