These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39381139)

  • 1. Optimizing purebred selection to improve crossbred performance.
    Barani S; Miraie Ashtiani SR; Nejati Javaremi A; Khansefid M; Esfandyari H
    Front Genet; 2024; 15():1384973. PubMed ID: 39381139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Alternative Single-Step GBLUP Approaches and Training Population Designs for Genomic Evaluation of Crossbred Animals.
    Alvarenga AB; Veroneze R; Oliveira HR; Marques DBD; Lopes PS; Silva FF; Brito LF
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():263. PubMed ID: 32328083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 28464109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
    Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metafounders May Reduce Bias in Composite Cattle Genomic Predictions.
    Kluska S; Masuda Y; Ferraz JBS; Tsuruta S; Eler JP; Baldi F; Lourenco D
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():678587. PubMed ID: 34490031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring unknown parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction: Insights from a simulated cattle population.
    Himmelbauer J; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst C; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Oct; 107(10):8170-8192. PubMed ID: 38908687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
    Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.
    Macedo FL; Christensen OF; Astruc JM; Aguilar I; Masuda Y; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Aug; 52(1):47. PubMed ID: 32787772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic evaluation for two-way crossbred performance in cattle.
    Mei Q; Liu H; Zhao S; Xiang T; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):17. PubMed ID: 36932324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model definition for genetic evaluation of purebred and crossbred lambs including heterosis.
    Vargas Jurado N; Notter DR; Taylor JB; Brown DJ; Mousel MR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jun; 100(6):. PubMed ID: 35696612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.
    Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R
    Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the use of statistical and machine learning methods for estimating breed composition of purebred and crossbred animals in thirteen cattle breeds using genomic information.
    Ryan CA; Berry DP; O'Brien A; Pabiou T; Purfield DC
    Front Genet; 2023; 14():1120312. PubMed ID: 37274789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.