These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39382730)
1. Evaluating the role of urine chemistry in shock wave lithotripsy outcomes. Erdoğan E; Sarıca K Urolithiasis; 2024 Oct; 52(1):136. PubMed ID: 39382730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Storz Medical Lithotripsy Index Predicts Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteric Stones. Keskin SK; Spencer M; Turney BW Urol J; 2023 Jul; 20(4):203-207. PubMed ID: 37489026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The New Lithotripsy Index predicts success of shock wave lithotripsy. Keskin SK; Spencer M; Lovegrove C; Turney BW World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):3049-3053. PubMed ID: 36380209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of renal calculi treatment via different extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) pathways. Yuan S; Velmurugan R; Bharathi SP Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Sep; 56(9):2887-2895. PubMed ID: 38581588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Skuginna V; Nguyen DP; Seiler R; Kiss B; Thalmann GN; Roth B Eur Urol; 2016 Feb; 69(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 26119561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review. Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi. Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition. Nakasato T; Morita J; Ogawa Y Urolithiasis; 2015 Feb; 43(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 25139151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease. Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter. Elkoushy MA; Hassan JA; Morehouse DD; Anidjar M; Andonian S Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 21550641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usability of shear wave elastography to predict the success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: prospective pilot study. Demir M; Dere O; Yağmur İ; Katı B; Pelit ES; Albayrak İH; Çiftçi H Urolithiasis; 2021 Jun; 49(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 33104861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy. Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between renal pelvis urine density and the risk of severe infectious complications in patient with symptom-free hydronephrosis after shock wave lithotripsy: a multi-center prospective study. Liu D; Liu J; Li Z; Ge C; Guo H; Song S; Li Z; Bai S Urolithiasis; 2024 Apr; 52(1):72. PubMed ID: 38683224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up. Torricelli FCM; Monga M; Yamauchi FI; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Batagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 31595801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm. Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A low or high BMI is a risk factor for renal hematoma after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones. Nussberger F; Roth B; Metzger T; Kiss B; Thalmann GN; Seiler R Urolithiasis; 2017 Jun; 45(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 27576325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL. Lv JL Urolithiasis; 2016 Nov; 44(6):539-544. PubMed ID: 27025864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can we predict the ancillary treatments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal and upper ureteral stones? Ibrahim A; Elatreisy A; Khogeer A; Ahmadi A; Mishra S; Faisal M; Sabnis R; Aube-Peterkin M; Carrier S; Ganpule A; Desai M Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Dec; 94(4):439-442. PubMed ID: 36576455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]